From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer (rev2)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:44:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5774DBE5.4010503@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160630052053.473.77185@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On 30/06/16 06:20, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/9279/
> State : warning
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 9279v2 Series without cover letter
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/9279/revisions/2/mbox
>
> Test gem_exec_flush:
> Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd:
> fail -> PASS (ro-byt-n2820)
> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-byt-n2820)
Looks like https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95125
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
> dmesg-warn -> SKIP (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
> dmesg-warn -> SKIP (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
>
> fi-skl-i5-6260u total:229 pass:202 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:25
> fi-snb-i7-2600 total:229 pass:174 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:53
> ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:229 pass:202 dwarn:1 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:23
> ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:229 pass:190 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:38
> ro-bsw-n3050 total:229 pass:176 dwarn:1 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:49
> ro-byt-n2820 total:229 pass:178 dwarn:1 dfail:1 fail:4 skip:45
> ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:229 pass:195 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:31
> ro-hsw-i7-4770r total:229 pass:195 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:31
> ro-ilk-i7-620lm total:229 pass:155 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:3 skip:70
> ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:224 pass:155 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:3 skip:65
> ro-ivb-i7-3770 total:229 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:40
> ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:229 pass:190 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:36
> ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:229 pass:206 dwarn:1 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:19
> ro-snb-i7-2620M total:229 pass:179 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:48
> fi-kbl-qkkr failed to connect after reboot
> fi-skl-i7-6700k failed to connect after reboot
> ro-bdw-i7-5557U failed to connect after reboot
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1335/
>
> 8a6521c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-06m-29d-16h-08m-16s UTC integration manifest
> 5a0b3b6 drm/i915: Trim some if-else braces
> 6546565 drm/i915: Consolidate legacy semaphore initialization
> 7cd391c drm/i915: Compact gen8_ring_sync
> c36607f drm/i915: Compact Gen8 semaphore initialization
> e862990 drm/i915: Move semaphore object creation into intel_ring_init_semaphores
> 2168bca drm/i915: Consolidate semaphore vfuncs init
> af5b4cc drm/i915: Consolidate dispatch_execbuffer vfunc
> 0c72cfa drm/i915: Consolidate init_hw vfunc
> 2cb2fab drm/i915: Consolidate get/set_seqno
> 6e3bbdc drm/i915: Consolidate get and put irq vfuncs
> 24b7851 drm/i915: Consolidate seqno_barrier vfunc
> 0bd03a1 drm/i915: Consolidate add_request vfunc
> 42e13b2 drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer
Looks good for merge. Just one r-b missing on v3 7/13.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-29 15:09 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Consolidate add_request vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Consolidate seqno_barrier vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Consolidate get and put irq vfuncs Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Consolidate get/set_seqno Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Consolidate init_hw vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Consolidate dispatch_execbuffer vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-30 15:12 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Consolidate semaphore vfuncs init Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore object creation into intel_ring_init_semaphores Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:30 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Compact Gen8 semaphore initialization Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:31 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Compact gen8_ring_sync Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:33 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Consolidate legacy semaphore initialization Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:34 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:00 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:24 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:43 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-15 13:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-19 18:38 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 9:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 12:50 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 16:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 17:08 ` Dave Gordon
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Trim some if-else braces Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:35 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:06 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer Patchwork
2016-06-30 5:20 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer (rev2) Patchwork
2016-06-30 8:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5774DBE5.4010503@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox