On 04/07/16 15:30, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> At the moment HAS_GUC_UCODE == HAS_GUC == IS_GEN9 ==
> (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen_mask & BIT(8)), which is true but not one. And
> module parameters are integers and not booleans so compiler will not
> normalize the value for us.
>
> Quick and easy fix for the GuC loading code and the whole area can
> be evaluated afterwards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> index d925e2daeb24..72ea5b97e242 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> @@ -687,9 +687,9 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>
>   	/* A negative value means "use platform default" */
>   	if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> -		i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev);
> +		i915.enable_guc_loading = !!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev);
>   	if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> -		i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev);
> +		i915.enable_guc_submission = !!HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev);
>
>   	if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev)) {
>   		fw_path = NULL;

Or we could just fix the IS_GENx() macros:

.Dave.