From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:51:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5784F5C5.5080406@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5784F077.5060307@intel.com>
On 12/07/16 14:28, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 12/07/16 10:06, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 11/07/16 19:01, Dave Gordon wrote:
>>> We had only DRM_INFO() and DRM_ERROR(), whereas the underlying printk()
>>> provides several other useful intermediate levels such as NOTICE and
>>> WARNING. So this patch fills out the set by providing both regular and
>>> once-only macros for each of the levels INFO, NOTICE, and WARNING, using
>>> a common underlying macro that does all the token-pasting.
>>>
>>> DRM_ERROR is unchanged, as it's not just a printk wrapper.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/drm/drmP.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h
>>> index cf918e3e..82648b1 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drmP.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h
>>> @@ -162,6 +162,26 @@ void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
>>> /** \name Macros to make printk easier */
>>> /*@{*/
>>>
>>> +#define _DRM_PRINTK(once, level, fmt, ...) \
>>> + do { \
>>> + printk##once(KERN_##level "[" DRM_NAME "] " fmt, \
>>> + ##__VA_ARGS__); \
>>> + } while (0)
>>> +
>>> +#define DRM_INFO(fmt, ...) \
>>> + _DRM_PRINTK(, INFO, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>>> +#define DRM_NOTE(fmt, ...) \
>>> + _DRM_PRINTK(, NOTICE, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>>
>> To me DRM_NOTICE would be better to keep consistent with kernel naming
>> for the equivalent log level.
>
> Maybe, but then we'd probably want DRM_WARNING() as well, and the names
> get cumbersome, especially when you want to tag "_ONCE" on the end as
> well. I liked the consistency of {INFO,NOTE,WARN} all being four letters ;)
>
> Any comments from dri-devel on INFO/NOTE/WARN vs INFO/NOTICE/WARNING?
> Or any other suggestions?
Luckily kernel offers us precedent to avoid the DRM_WARNING verbosity
and establish the only exception where log level symbolic name does not
match the printk helper name. :)
#define pr_emerg(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_EMERG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define pr_alert(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_ALERT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define pr_crit(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_CRIT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define pr_err(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define pr_warning(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define pr_warn pr_warning
#define pr_notice(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define pr_info(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
And short form is indeed more popular:
$ grep pr_warn\( drivers/ -r | wc -l
1935
$ grep pr_warning\( drivers/ -r | wc -l
141
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-11 18:01 [PATCH 1/3] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
2016-07-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN() Dave Gordon
2016-07-12 9:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-12 9:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 9:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-12 12:29 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels Dave Gordon
2016-07-12 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-12 15:11 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-12 9:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-12 13:28 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-12 13:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-07-12 11:06 ` Eric Engestrom
2016-07-12 14:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-12 14:53 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-12 14:59 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5784F5C5.5080406@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox