public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
To: "Deak, Imre" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Tamminen, Eero T" <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915: Give proper names to MOCS entries
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:22:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5785A5EE.1070906@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467380406-11954-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>

On 07/01/2016 09:40 PM, Deak, Imre wrote:
> The purpose for each MOCS entry isn't well defined atm. Defining these
> is important to remove any uncertainty about the use of these entries
> for example in terms of performance and GPU/CPU coherency.
>
> Suggested by Ville.
>
> CC: Rong R Yang<rong.r.yang@intel.com>
> CC: Yakui Zhao<yakui.zhao@intel.com>
> CC: Ville Syrjälä<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> CC: Chris Wilson<chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak<imre.deak@intel.com>

This looks readable and meaningful after giving proper names to MOCS 
entry index.

But not sure whether the comment of I915_MOCS_CACHE has one typo?

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mocs.c | 13 +++++++------
>   include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h       | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mocs.c
> index 927825f..86adc11 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mocs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mocs.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ struct drm_i915_mocs_table {
>    *       end.
>    */
>   static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skylake_mocs_table[] = {
> -	{ /* 0x00000009 */
> +	[I915_MOCS_UNCACHED] = {
> +	  /* 0x00000009 */
>   	  .control_value = LE_CACHEABILITY(LE_UC) |
>   			   LE_TGT_CACHE(LE_TC_LLC_ELLC) |
>   			   LE_LRUM(0) | LE_AOM(0) | LE_RSC(0) | LE_SCC(0) |
> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skylake_mocs_table[] = {
>   	  /* 0x0010 */
>   	  .l3cc_value =    L3_ESC(0) | L3_SCC(0) | L3_CACHEABILITY(L3_UC),
>   	},
> -	{
> +	[I915_MOCS_AUTO] = {
>   	  /* 0x00000038 */
>   	  .control_value = LE_CACHEABILITY(LE_PAGETABLE) |
>   			   LE_TGT_CACHE(LE_TC_LLC_ELLC) |
> @@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skylake_mocs_table[] = {
>   	  /* 0x0030 */
>   	  .l3cc_value =    L3_ESC(0) | L3_SCC(0) | L3_CACHEABILITY(L3_WB),
>   	},
> -	{
> +	[I915_MOCS_CACHED] = {
>   	  /* 0x0000003b */
>   	  .control_value = LE_CACHEABILITY(LE_WB) |
>   			   LE_TGT_CACHE(LE_TC_LLC_ELLC) |
> @@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skylake_mocs_table[] = {
>
>   /* NOTE: the LE_TGT_CACHE is not used on Broxton */
>   static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry broxton_mocs_table[] = {
> -	{
> +	[I915_MOCS_UNCACHED] = {
>   	  /* 0x00000009 */
>   	  .control_value = LE_CACHEABILITY(LE_UC) |
>   			   LE_TGT_CACHE(LE_TC_LLC_ELLC) |
> @@ -138,7 +139,7 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry broxton_mocs_table[] = {
>   	  /* 0x0010 */
>   	  .l3cc_value =    L3_ESC(0) | L3_SCC(0) | L3_CACHEABILITY(L3_UC),
>   	},
> -	{
> +	[I915_MOCS_AUTO] = {
>   	  /* 0x00000038 */
>   	  .control_value = LE_CACHEABILITY(LE_PAGETABLE) |
>   			   LE_TGT_CACHE(LE_TC_LLC_ELLC) |
> @@ -148,7 +149,7 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry broxton_mocs_table[] = {
>   	  /* 0x0030 */
>   	  .l3cc_value =    L3_ESC(0) | L3_SCC(0) | L3_CACHEABILITY(L3_WB),
>   	},
> -	{
> +	[I915_MOCS_CACHED] = {
>   	  /* 0x00000039 */
>   	  .control_value = LE_CACHEABILITY(LE_UC) |
>   			   LE_TGT_CACHE(LE_TC_LLC_ELLC) |
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> index c17d63d..a5d116f 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,30 @@ extern "C" {
>   #define I915_ERROR_UEVENT		"ERROR"
>   #define I915_RESET_UEVENT		"RESET"
>
> +/*
> + * MOCS indexes used for GPU surfaces, defining the cacheability of the
> + * surface data and the coherency for this data wrt. CPU vs. GPU accesses.
> + */
> +enum i915_mocs_table_index {
> +	/*
> +	 * Not cached anywhere, coherency between CPU and GPU accesses is
> +	 * guaranteed.
> +	 */
> +	I915_MOCS_UNCACHED,
> +	/*
> +	 * Cacheability and coherency controlled by the kernel automatically
> +	 * based on the DRM_I915_GEM_SET_CACHING IOCTL setting and the current
> +	 * usage of the surface (used for display scanout or not).
> +	 */
> +	I915_MOCS_AUTO,
> +	/*
> +	 * Cached in all GPU caches available on the platform.
> +	 * Coherency between CPU and GPU accesses to the surface is not
> +	 * guaranteed without extra synchronization.
> +	 */

IMO the coherency is guaranteed without extra synchronization for the 
MOCS_CACHED.

> +	I915_MOCS_CACHED,
> +};
> +
>   /* Each region is a minimum of 16k, and there are at most 255 of them.
>    */
>   #define I915_NR_TEX_REGIONS 255	/* table size 2k - maximum due to use

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-13  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-01 13:40 [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/bxt: Fix performance due to bogus MOCS entry Imre Deak
2016-07-01 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/gen9: Clean up MOCS table definitions Imre Deak
2016-07-01 21:23   ` Bish, Jim
2016-07-01 21:47   ` Francisco Jerez
2016-07-12 11:08     ` Imre Deak
2016-07-13  2:10   ` Zhao Yakui
2016-07-01 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/bxt: Fix inadvertent CPU snooping due to incorrect MOCS config Imre Deak
2016-07-13  2:32   ` Zhao Yakui
2016-07-14  8:33   ` Yang, Rong R
2016-07-01 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915: Give proper names to MOCS entries Imre Deak
2016-07-01 13:49   ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-01 13:56     ` Imre Deak
2016-07-01 14:32   ` [PATCH v4 " Imre Deak
2016-07-13  2:22   ` Zhao Yakui [this message]
2016-07-13 10:04     ` [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2016-07-14  1:38       ` Zhao Yakui
2016-07-01 14:54 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/bxt: Fix performance due to bogus MOCS entry Patchwork
2016-07-19 18:15   ` Imre Deak
2016-07-01 15:15 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/bxt: Fix performance due to bogus MOCS entry (rev2) Patchwork
2016-07-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/bxt: Fix performance due to bogus MOCS entry Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5785A5EE.1070906@intel.com \
    --to=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=eero.t.tamminen@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox