From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 50/64] drm/i915: Prepare i915_gem_active for annotations
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:40:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578660D3.1090904@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467880930-23082-50-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 07/07/16 09:41, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In the future, we will want to add annotations to the i915_gem_active
> struct. The API is thus expanded to hide direct access to the contents
> of i915_gem_active and mediated instead through a number of helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 13 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 91 +++++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c | 11 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 9 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 ++--
> 9 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index dd832eace487..ae1c640fc1c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -155,10 +155,10 @@ describe_obj(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> obj->base.write_domain);
> for_each_engine_id(engine, dev_priv, id)
> seq_printf(m, "%x ",
> - i915_gem_request_get_seqno(obj->last_read[id].request));
> + i915_gem_active_get_seqno(&obj->last_read[id]));
> seq_printf(m, "] %x %x%s%s%s",
> - i915_gem_request_get_seqno(obj->last_write.request),
> - i915_gem_request_get_seqno(obj->last_fence.request),
> + i915_gem_active_get_seqno(&obj->last_write),
> + i915_gem_active_get_seqno(&obj->last_fence),
> i915_cache_level_str(to_i915(obj->base.dev), obj->cache_level),
> obj->dirty ? " dirty" : "",
> obj->madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED ? " purgeable" : "");
> @@ -195,8 +195,11 @@ describe_obj(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> *t = '\0';
> seq_printf(m, " (%s mappable)", s);
> }
> - if (obj->last_write.request)
> - seq_printf(m, " (%s)", obj->last_write.request->engine->name);
> +
> + engine = i915_gem_active_get_engine(&obj->last_write);
> + if (engine)
> + seq_printf(m, " (%s)", engine->name);
> +
> if (obj->frontbuffer_bits)
> seq_printf(m, " (frontbuffer: 0x%03x)", obj->frontbuffer_bits);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 5f302faf86e7..9c371e84b1bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1349,27 +1349,30 @@ int
> i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> bool readonly)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> struct reservation_object *resv;
> int ret, i;
>
> if (readonly) {
> - if (obj->last_write.request) {
> - ret = i915_wait_request(obj->last_write.request);
> + request = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_write);
Why not get_request since you have get_engine? Or later there will be
get_request with different semantics?
> + if (request) {
> + ret = i915_wait_request(request);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - i = obj->last_write.request->engine->id;
> - if (obj->last_read[i].request == obj->last_write.request)
> + i = request->engine->id;
> + if (i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[i]) == request)
> i915_gem_object_retire__read(obj, i);
> else
> i915_gem_object_retire__write(obj);
> }
> } else {
> for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
> - if (!obj->last_read[i].request)
> + request = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[i]);
> + if (!request)
> continue;
>
> - ret = i915_wait_request(obj->last_read[i].request);
> + ret = i915_wait_request(request);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1397,9 +1400,9 @@ i915_gem_object_retire_request(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> {
> int ring = req->engine->id;
>
> - if (obj->last_read[ring].request == req)
> + if (i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[ring]) == req)
> i915_gem_object_retire__read(obj, ring);
> - else if (obj->last_write.request == req)
> + else if (i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_write) == req)
> i915_gem_object_retire__write(obj);
>
> if (!i915_reset_in_progress(&req->i915->gpu_error))
> @@ -1428,20 +1431,20 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__nonblocking(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> if (readonly) {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
>
> - req = obj->last_write.request;
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_write);
> if (req == NULL)
> return 0;
>
> - requests[n++] = i915_gem_request_get(req);
> + requests[n++] = req;
It used to take a reference and now it doesn't.
> } else {
> for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
>
> - req = obj->last_read[i].request;
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[i]);
> if (req == NULL)
> continue;
>
> - requests[n++] = i915_gem_request_get(req);
> + requests[n++] = req;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2383,25 +2386,27 @@ void i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
> static void
> i915_gem_object_retire__write(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - GEM_BUG_ON(!obj->last_write.request);
> - GEM_BUG_ON(!(obj->active & intel_engine_flag(obj->last_write.request->engine)));
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!__i915_gem_active_is_busy(&obj->last_write));
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!(obj->active & intel_engine_flag(i915_gem_active_get_engine(&obj->last_write))));
>
> - i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_write.request, NULL);
> + i915_gem_active_set(&obj->last_write, NULL);
Aha!
> intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, true, ORIGIN_CS);
> }
>
> static void
> i915_gem_object_retire__read(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int ring)
> {
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> struct i915_vma *vma;
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(!obj->last_read[ring].request);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!__i915_gem_active_is_busy(&obj->last_read[ring]));
> GEM_BUG_ON(!(obj->active & (1 << ring)));
>
> list_del_init(&obj->engine_list[ring]);
> - i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_read[ring].request, NULL);
> + i915_gem_active_set(&obj->last_read[ring], NULL);
>
> - if (obj->last_write.request && obj->last_write.request->engine->id == ring)
> + engine = i915_gem_active_get_engine(&obj->last_write);
> + if (engine && engine->id == ring)
> i915_gem_object_retire__write(obj);
>
> obj->active &= ~(1 << ring);
> @@ -2420,7 +2425,7 @@ i915_gem_object_retire__read(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int ring)
> list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->inactive_list);
> }
>
> - i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_fence.request, NULL);
> + i915_gem_active_set(&obj->last_fence, NULL);
> i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> }
>
> @@ -2618,7 +2623,7 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> struct drm_i915_gem_object,
> engine_list[engine->id]);
>
> - if (!list_empty(&obj->last_read[engine->id].request->list))
> + if (!list_empty(&i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[engine->id])->list))
> break;
>
> i915_gem_object_retire__read(obj, engine->id);
> @@ -2746,7 +2751,7 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
>
> - req = obj->last_read[i].request;
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[i]);
> if (req == NULL)
> continue;
>
> @@ -2786,7 +2791,7 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_wait *args = data;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *req[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *requests[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
> int i, n = 0;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -2822,20 +2827,21 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> i915_gem_object_put(obj);
>
> for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
> - if (!obj->last_read[i].request)
> - continue;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
>
> - req[n++] = i915_gem_request_get(obj->last_read[i].request);
> + req = i915_gem_active_get(&obj->last_read[i]);
Oh right there is a get request one, this time preserving the reference
taking behaviour.
> + if (req)
> + requests[n++] = req;
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> if (ret == 0)
> - ret = __i915_wait_request(req[i], true,
> + ret = __i915_wait_request(requests[i], true,
> args->timeout_ns > 0 ? &args->timeout_ns : NULL,
> to_rps_client(file));
> - i915_gem_request_put(req[i]);
> + i915_gem_request_put(requests[i]);
> }
> return ret;
>
> @@ -2908,7 +2914,7 @@ i915_gem_object_sync(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *to)
> {
> const bool readonly = obj->base.pending_write_domain == 0;
> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *req[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *requests[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
> int ret, i, n;
>
> if (!obj->active)
> @@ -2916,15 +2922,22 @@ i915_gem_object_sync(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>
> n = 0;
> if (readonly) {
> - if (obj->last_write.request)
> - req[n++] = obj->last_write.request;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
> +
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_write);
> + if (req)
> + requests[n++] = req;
> } else {
> - for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++)
> - if (obj->last_read[i].request)
> - req[n++] = obj->last_read[i].request;
> + for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
> +
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[i]);
> + if (req)
> + requests[n++] = req;
> + }
> }
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> - ret = __i915_gem_object_sync(obj, to, req[i]);
> + ret = __i915_gem_object_sync(obj, to, requests[i]);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -4017,17 +4030,17 @@ i915_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>
> args->busy = 0;
> if (obj->active) {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
> -
> - req = obj->last_read[i].request;
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[i]);
> if (req)
> args->busy |= 1 << (16 + req->engine->exec_id);
> }
> - if (obj->last_write.request)
> - args->busy |= obj->last_write.request->engine->exec_id;
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_write);
> + if (req)
> + args->busy |= req->engine->exec_id;
> }
>
> unref:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> index aa767ca28532..38000c59d456 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static void export_fences(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>
> active = obj->active;
> for_each_active(active, idx) {
> - req = obj->last_read[idx].request;
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_read[idx]);
> if (!req)
> continue;
>
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static void export_fences(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> reservation_object_add_shared_fence(resv, &req->fence);
> }
>
> - req = obj->last_write.request;
> + req = i915_gem_active_peek(&obj->last_write);
> if (req)
> reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, &req->fence);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c
> index 9838046801bd..9fdbd66128a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence.c
> @@ -261,14 +261,13 @@ static inline void i915_gem_object_fence_lost(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> static int
> i915_gem_object_wait_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - if (obj->last_fence.request) {
> - int ret = i915_wait_request(obj->last_fence.request);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + int ret;
>
> - i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_fence.request, NULL);
> - }
> + ret = i915_gem_active_wait(&obj->last_fence);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> + i915_gem_active_set(&obj->last_fence, NULL);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
> index ff8c54fa955f..46d9b00a28d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
> @@ -275,14 +275,138 @@ static inline bool i915_spin_request(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
> * resource including itself.
> */
> struct i915_gem_active {
> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *__request;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * i915_gem_active_set - updates the tracker to watch the current request
> + * @active - the active tracker
> + * @request - the request to watch
> + *
> + * i915_gem_active_set() watches the given @request for completion. Whilst
> + * that @request is busy, the @active reports busy. When that @request is
> + * retired, the @active tracker is updated to report idle.
> + */
> static inline void
> i915_gem_active_set(struct i915_gem_active *active,
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> {
> - i915_gem_request_assign(&active->request, request);
> + i915_gem_request_assign(&active->__request, request);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * i915_gem_active_peek - report the request being monitored
> + * @active - the active tracker
> + *
> + * i915_gem_active_peek() returns the current request being tracked, or NULL.
> + * It does not obtain a reference on the request for the caller, so the
> + * caller must hold struct_mutex.
> + */
> +static inline struct drm_i915_gem_request *
> +i915_gem_active_peek(const struct i915_gem_active *active)
> +{
> + return active->__request;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * i915_gem_active_get - return a reference to the active request
> + * @active - the active tracker
> + *
> + * i915_gem_active_get() returns a reference to the active request, or NULL
> + * if the active tracker is idle. The caller must hold struct_mutex.
> + */
> +static inline struct drm_i915_gem_request *
> +i915_gem_active_get(const struct i915_gem_active *active)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> +
> + request = i915_gem_active_peek(active);
> + if (!request || i915_gem_request_completed(request))
The check for request_completed feels like a hack - why it is needed?
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return i915_gem_request_get(request);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __i915_gem_active_is_busy - report whether the active tracker is assigned
> + * @active - the active tracker
> + *
> + * __i915_gem_active_is_busy() returns true if the active tracker is currently
> + * assigned to a request. Due to the lazy retiring, that request may be idle
> + * and this may report stale information.
> + */
> +static inline bool
> +__i915_gem_active_is_busy(const struct i915_gem_active *active)
> +{
> + return i915_gem_active_peek(active);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * i915_gem_active_is_idle - report whether the active tracker is idle
> + * @active - the active tracker
> + *
> + * i915_gem_active_is_idle() returns true if the active tracker is currently
> + * unassigned or if the request is complete (but not yet retired). Requires
> + * the caller to hold struct_mutex (but that can be relaxed if desired).
> + */
> +static inline bool
> +i915_gem_active_is_idle(const struct i915_gem_active *active)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> +
> + request = i915_gem_active_peek(active);
> + if (!request || i915_gem_request_completed(request))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * i915_gem_active_wait - waits until the request is completed
> + * @active - the active request on which to wait
> + *
> + * i915_gem_active_wait() waits until the request is completed before
> + * returning.
> + */
> +static inline int __must_check
> +i915_gem_active_wait(const struct i915_gem_active *active)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> +
> + request = i915_gem_active_peek(active);
> + if (!request)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return i915_wait_request(request);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * i915_gem_active_retire - waits until the request is retired
> + * @active - the active request on which to wait
> + *
> + * Unlike i915_gem_active_eait(), this i915_gem_active_retire() will
s/eait/wait/
> + * make sure the request is retired before returning.
> + */
> +static inline int __must_check
> +i915_gem_active_retire(const struct i915_gem_active *active)
> +{
> + return i915_gem_active_wait(active);
> +}
But how does it ensure anything different than i915_gem_active_wait when
it calls the very function? Maybe in future patches there will be a
difference?
> +
> +/* Convenience functions for peeking at state inside active's request whilst
> + * guarded by the struct_mutex.
> + */
> +
> +static inline uint32_t
> +i915_gem_active_get_seqno(const struct i915_gem_active *active)
> +{
> + return i915_gem_request_get_seqno(i915_gem_active_peek(active));
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct intel_engine_cs *
> +i915_gem_active_get_engine(const struct i915_gem_active *active)
> +{
> + return i915_gem_request_get_engine(i915_gem_active_peek(active));
> }
>
> #define for_each_active(mask, idx) \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
> index 00d796da65fb..8cef2d6b291a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ i915_gem_set_tiling(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> }
>
> obj->fence_dirty =
> - obj->last_fence.request ||
> + !i915_gem_active_is_idle(&obj->last_fence) ||
> obj->fence_reg != I915_FENCE_REG_NONE;
>
> obj->tiling_mode = args->tiling_mode;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> index 32f50a70ea42..00ab5e9d2eb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> @@ -74,11 +74,9 @@ static void wait_rendering(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
>
> - req = obj->last_read[i].request;
> - if (req == NULL)
> - continue;
> -
> - requests[n++] = i915_gem_request_get(req);
> + req = i915_gem_active_get(&obj->last_read[i]);
> + if (req)
> + requests[n++] = req;
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index 5e12b8ee49d2..9e1949f2f4dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -744,13 +744,14 @@ static void capture_bo(struct drm_i915_error_buffer *err,
> struct i915_vma *vma)
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> int i;
>
> err->size = obj->base.size;
> err->name = obj->base.name;
> for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++)
> - err->rseqno[i] = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(obj->last_read[i].request);
> - err->wseqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(obj->last_write.request);
> + err->rseqno[i] = i915_gem_active_get_seqno(&obj->last_read[i]);
> + err->wseqno = i915_gem_active_get_seqno(&obj->last_write);
> err->gtt_offset = vma->node.start;
> err->read_domains = obj->base.read_domains;
> err->write_domain = obj->base.write_domain;
> @@ -762,8 +763,10 @@ static void capture_bo(struct drm_i915_error_buffer *err,
> err->dirty = obj->dirty;
> err->purgeable = obj->madv != I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
> err->userptr = obj->userptr.mm != NULL;
> - err->ring = obj->last_write.request ? obj->last_write.request->engine->id : -1;
> err->cache_level = obj->cache_level;
> +
> + engine = i915_gem_active_get_engine(&obj->last_write);
> + err->ring = engine ? engine->id : -1;
> }
>
> static u32 capture_active_bo(struct drm_i915_error_buffer *err,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 27ac6db4e26a..a0abe5588d17 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -11465,7 +11465,7 @@ static bool use_mmio_flip(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> if (resv && !reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(resv, false))
> return true;
>
> - return engine != i915_gem_request_get_engine(obj->last_write.request);
> + return engine != i915_gem_active_get_engine(&obj->last_write);
> }
>
> static void skl_do_mmio_flip(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> @@ -11768,7 +11768,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> } else if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev) || IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
> engine = &dev_priv->engine[BCS];
> } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 7) {
> - engine = i915_gem_request_get_engine(obj->last_write.request);
> + engine = i915_gem_active_get_engine(&obj->last_write);
> if (engine == NULL || engine->id != RCS)
> engine = &dev_priv->engine[BCS];
> } else {
> @@ -11789,9 +11789,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> if (mmio_flip) {
> INIT_WORK(&work->mmio_work, intel_mmio_flip_work_func);
>
> - i915_gem_request_assign(&work->flip_queued_req,
> - obj->last_write.request);
> -
> + work->flip_queued_req = i915_gem_active_get(&obj->last_write);
> schedule_work(&work->mmio_work);
> } else {
> request = i915_gem_request_alloc(engine, engine->last_context);
> @@ -14092,11 +14090,8 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
> }
>
> if (ret == 0) {
> - struct intel_plane_state *plane_state =
> - to_intel_plane_state(new_state);
> -
> - i915_gem_request_assign(&plane_state->wait_req,
> - obj->last_write.request);
> + to_intel_plane_state(new_state)->wait_req =
> + i915_gem_active_get(&obj->last_write);
> }
>
> return ret;
>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-13 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 8:41 [PATCH 01/64] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Queue hangcheck before sleeping Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 02/64] drm/i915: Preserve current RPS frequency across init Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 03/64] drm/i915: Remove superfluous powersave work flushing Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 04/64] drm/i915: Defer enabling rc6 til after we submit the first batch/context Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 05/64] drm/i915: Remove temporary RPM wakeref assert disables Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 06/64] drm: Restore double clflush on the last partial cacheline Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 13:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-13 8:07 ` Mika Kuoppala
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 07/64] drm/i915: Move GEM request routines to i915_gem_request.c Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 08/64] drm/i915: Retire oldest completed request before allocating next Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 9:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-07 9:45 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 10:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-07 10:10 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-08 9:21 ` Mika Kuoppala
2016-07-08 9:28 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 09/64] drm/i915: Mark all current requests as complete before resetting them Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 16:09 ` Mika Kuoppala
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 10/64] drm/i915: Derive GEM requests from dma-fence Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 11/64] drm/i915: Disable waitboosting for fence_wait() Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 12/64] drm/i915: Disable waitboosting for mmioflips/semaphores Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 13/64] drm/i915: Export our request as a dma-buf fence on the reservation object Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 14/64] drm/i915: Wait on external rendering for GEM objects Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 15/64] drm/i915: Mark imported dma-buf objects as being coherent Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 16/64] drm/i915: Rename request reference/unreference to get/put Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 17/64] drm/i915: Rename i915_gem_context_reference/unreference() Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 18/64] drm/i915: Wrap drm_gem_object_lookup in i915_gem_object_lookup Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 19/64] drm/i915: Wrap drm_gem_object_reference in i915_gem_object_get Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 20/64] drm/i915: Rename drm_gem_object_unreference in preparation for lockless free Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 21/64] drm/i915: Rename drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked " Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 22/64] drm/i915: Treat ringbuffer writes as write to normal memory Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 23/64] drm/i915: Rename ring->virtual_start as ring->vaddr Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 24/64] drm/i915: Convert i915_semaphores_is_enabled over to early sanitize Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 25/64] drm/i915: Unify intel_logical_ring_emit and intel_ring_emit Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 26/64] drm/i915: Rename request->ringbuf to request->ring Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 27/64] drm/i915: Rename backpointer from intel_ringbuffer to intel_engine_cs Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 28/64] drm/i915: Rename intel_context[engine].ringbuf Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 29/64] drm/i915: Rename struct intel_ringbuffer to struct intel_ring Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 30/64] drm/i915: Rename residual ringbuf parameters Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 31/64] drm/i915: Rename intel_pin_and_map_ring() Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 32/64] drm/i915: Remove obsolete engine->gpu_caches_dirty Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 33/64] drm/i915: Simplify request_alloc by returning the allocated request Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 34/64] drm/i915: Unify legacy/execlists emission of MI_BATCHBUFFER_START Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 35/64] drm/i915: Convert engine->write_tail to operate on a request Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 36/64] drm/i915: Unify request submission Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 37/64] drm/i915: Stop passing caller's num_dwords to engine->semaphore.signal() Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 38/64] drm/i915: Reuse legacy breadcrumbs + tail emission Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 39/64] drm/i915/ringbuffer: Specialise SNB+ request emission for semaphores Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 40/64] drm/i915: Remove duplicate golden render state init from execlists Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 41/64] drm/i915: Unify legacy/execlists submit_execbuf callbacks Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 42/64] drm/i915: Simplify calling engine->sync_to Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 43/64] drm/i915: Amalgamate GGTT/ppGTT vma debug list walkers Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 44/64] drm/i915: Split early global GTT initialisation Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 45/64] drm/i915: Store owning file on the i915_address_space Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 46/64] drm/i915: Count how many VMA are bound for an object Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 14:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-12 14:38 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 15:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-12 16:08 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 47/64] drm/i915: Be more careful when unbinding vma Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 15:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-12 16:42 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-13 8:53 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 48/64] drm/i915: Kill drop_pages() Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 15:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 49/64] drm/i915: Introduce i915_gem_active for request tracking Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 16:05 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-12 16:30 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-13 8:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 50/64] drm/i915: Prepare i915_gem_active for annotations Chris Wilson
2016-07-13 15:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-07-13 15:58 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-14 9:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-14 10:04 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 51/64] drm/i915: Mark up i915_gem_active for locking annotation Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 52/64] drm/i915: Refactor blocking waits Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 53/64] drm/i915: Rename request->list to link for consistency Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 54/64] drm/i915: Remove obsolete i915_gem_object_flush_active() Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 55/64] drm/i915: Refactor activity tracking for requests Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 56/64] drm/i915: Convert intel_overlay to request tracking Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 57/64] drm/i915: Move the special case wait-request handling to its one caller Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 58/64] drm/i915: Double check activity before relocations Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 59/64] drm/i915: Move request list retirement to i915_gem_request.c Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 60/64] drm/i915: i915_vma_move_to_active prep patch Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 61/64] drm/i915: Track active vma requests Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 62/64] drm/i915: Release vma when the handle is closed Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 63/64] drm/i915: Mark the context and address space as closed Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 8:42 ` [PATCH 64/64] Revert "drm/i915: Clean up associated VMAs on context destruction" Chris Wilson
2016-07-07 9:12 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [01/64] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Queue hangcheck before sleeping Patchwork
2016-07-07 9:28 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-08 8:44 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578660D3.1090904@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox