From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: unify first-stage engine struct setup
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 12:33:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578778A1.5040503@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57863F41.9000308@linux.intel.com>
On 13/07/16 14:16, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 13/07/16 13:23, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 05:47:11PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>> From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
>>>
[snip]
>>> {
>>> - const struct logical_ring_info *info = &logical_rings[id];
>>> + const struct engine_info *info = &intel_engines[id];
>>> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = &dev_priv->engine[id];
>>> - enum forcewake_domains fw_domains;
>>>
>>> engine->id = id;
>>> + engine->i915 = dev_priv;
>>> engine->name = info->name;
>>> engine->exec_id = info->exec_id;
>>> - engine->guc_id = info->guc_id;
>>> + engine->hw_id = engine->guc_id = info->guc_id;
>>
>> Optional bikeshed: s/info->guc_id/info->hw_id/ makes sense imo in the new
>> context. Or nuking engine->guc_id.
>
> Someone said we cannot be sure they will be the same in the future. So
> maybe just rename to hw_id for now.
>
> Regards,
> Tvrtko
The GuC firmware *could* use a completely different enumeration of the
engines, but why would it? Since it's closely tied to the hardware, it
*ought* to use the same naming scheme as the h/w. So I have no objection
to getting rid of guc_id entirely, and changing existing uses to use
hw_id instead.
OTOH it seems little benefit and would certainly involve more work to
reverse. The firmware team might, after all, decide that they too want
to decouple the logical-engine-numbers used for the KMD interface from
whatever the hardware team decide is the best way to number engines --
which might after all change between generations or even different SKUs
of the same device!
SO, I think the "best" version of that line is probably:
+ engine->hw_id = info->hw_id;
+
+ /* Current GuC f/w uses hw_id not driver id */
+ engine->guc_id = info->hw_id;
and we'll add "info->guc_id" back again if it ever becomes necessary.
.Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-14 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-01 16:47 [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: unify first-stage engine struct setup Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-01 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Prepare for engine init unification Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-01 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Unify engine init loop Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-01 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Make more use of the shared engine irq setup Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-13 12:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-13 13:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-01 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Simplify intel_init_ring_buffer prototype Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-13 12:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-01 17:08 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: unify first-stage engine struct setup Patchwork
2016-07-13 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Daniel Vetter
2016-07-13 13:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-13 13:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-14 14:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-14 11:33 ` Dave Gordon [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-06 10:52 Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578778A1.5040503@intel.com \
--to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox