From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Consolidate legacy semaphore initialization
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:13:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5788E174.4040801@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160629160057.GQ28577@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 29/06/16 17:00, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:41:58PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 29/06/16 16:34, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:09:31PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Replace per-engine initialization with a common half-programatic,
>>>> half-data driven code for ease of maintenance and compactness.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>
>>> This is the biggest pill to swallow (since our 5x5 table is only
>>> sparsely populated), but it looks correct, and more importantly easier to
>>> read.
>>
>> Yeah I was out of ideas on how to improve it. Fresh mind needed to
>> try and spot a pattern in how MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_* and GEN6_*SYNC map
>> to bits and registers respectively, and write it as a function.
>
> It's actually a very simple cyclic function based on register
> offset = base + (signaler hw_id - waiter hw_id - 1) % num_rings.
>
> (The only real challenge is picking the direction.)
>
> commit c8c99b0f0dea1ced5d0e10cdb9143356cc16b484
> Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> Date: Wed Sep 14 20:32:47 2011 -0700
>
> drm/i915: Dumb down the semaphore logic
>
> While I think the previous code is correct, it was hard to follow and
> hard to debug. Since we already have a ring abstraction, might as well
> use it to handle the semaphore updates and compares.
Doesn't seem to fit, or I just can't figure it out. Needs two functions
to get rid of the table:
f1(0, 1) = 2
f1(0, 2) = 0
f1(0, 3) = 2
f1(1, 0) = 0
f1(1, 2) = 2
f1(1, 3) = 1
f1(2, 0) = 2
f1(2, 1) = 0
f1(2, 3) = 0
f1(3, 0) = 1
f1(3, 1) = 1
f1(3, 2) = 1
and:
f2(0, 1) = 1
f2(0, 2) = 0
f2(0, 3) = 1
f2(1, 0) = 0
f2(1, 2) = 1
f2(1, 3) = 2
f2(2, 0) = 1
f2(2, 1) = 0
f2(2, 3) = 0
f2(3, 0) = 2
f2(3, 1) = 2
f2(3, 2) = 2
A weekend math puzzle for someone? :)
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-15 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-29 15:09 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Consolidate add_request vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Consolidate seqno_barrier vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Consolidate get and put irq vfuncs Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Consolidate get/set_seqno Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Consolidate init_hw vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Consolidate dispatch_execbuffer vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-30 15:12 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Consolidate semaphore vfuncs init Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore object creation into intel_ring_init_semaphores Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:30 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Compact Gen8 semaphore initialization Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:31 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Compact gen8_ring_sync Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:33 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Consolidate legacy semaphore initialization Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:34 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:00 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:24 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:43 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-15 13:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-07-19 18:38 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 9:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 12:50 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 16:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 17:08 ` Dave Gordon
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Trim some if-else braces Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:35 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:06 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer Patchwork
2016-06-30 5:20 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer (rev2) Patchwork
2016-06-30 8:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5788E174.4040801@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox