public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Treat eDP as always connected, again
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:01:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <578CD319.7040100@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <578CD07B.6090303@intel.com>

On 18/07/16 13:50, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 18/07/16 13:29, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:43:08AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
>>> == Series Details ==
>>>
>>> Series: drm/i915: Treat eDP as always connected, again
>>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/9977/
>>> State : failure
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>>
>>> Series 9977v1 drm/i915: Treat eDP as always connected, again
>>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/9977/revisions/1/mbox
>>>
>>> Test gem_exec_suspend:
>>>          Subgroup basic-s3:
>>>                  pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-skl-i5-6260u)
>>> Test gem_sync:
>>>          Subgroup basic-store-each:
>>>                  pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (ro-bdw-i7-5600u)
>>
>> I tried to find the bug reports for these, and we don't track them.
>> And at
>> least the 2nd one looks like it's a one-off, so who knows what's going
>> on.
>>
>> But while trying to figure out what's going on I stumbled over about 5
>> other sporadic CI issues in those boxes which aren't event tracked
>> either.
>>
>> /me cries
>>
>> So normally not good enough for CI, but regressions win even against our
>> shitty CI. Hence applied and will cherry-pick over to -fixes.
>> -Daniel
>
> Looks like the failure in basic-store-each has been happening since at
> least 2016-07-10, but only on one specific BDW machine
> (ro-bdw-i7-5600u). Failure is:
>
>  > Failed assertion: intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd) == 0
>
> Intermittent, though, as Chris's recent results show:
>
>> Test gem_sync:
>>         Subgroup basic-store-each:
>>                 dmesg-fail -> PASS       (ro-bdw-i7-5600u)
>
> making it very difficult to determine whether it's a real regression or
> some problem with that specific machine -- it doesn't happen on the
> other BDWs, but they're all slightly different.
>
> .Dave.

Bug filed: Bug 96975 - [BAT BDW] basic-store-each fails, 
intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd) == 0

.Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18 10:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: Treat eDP as always connected, again ville.syrjala
2016-07-18 11:43 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-07-18 12:29   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-18 12:45     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-07-18 12:50     ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-18 13:01       ` Dave Gordon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=578CD319.7040100@intel.com \
    --to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox