public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/guc: use for_each_engine_id() where appropriate
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:45:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5791F955.5050300@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5791EF98.10908@linux.intel.com>

On 22/07/16 11:04, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 21/07/16 19:15, Dave Gordon wrote:
>> Now that host structures are indexed by host engine-id rather than
>> guc_id, we can usefully convert some for_each_engine() loops to use
>> for_each_engine_id() and avoid multiple dereferences of engine->id.
>>
>> Also a few related tweaks to cache structure members locally wherever
>> they're used more than once or twice, hopefully eliminating memory
>> references.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c        | 17 +++++++++--------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> index 793b1d9..2106766 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> @@ -2535,6 +2535,7 @@ static void i915_guc_client_info(struct seq_file
>> *m,
>>                    struct i915_guc_client *client)
>>   {
>>       struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>> +    enum intel_engine_id id;
>>       uint64_t tot = 0;
>>
>>       seq_printf(m, "\tPriority %d, GuC ctx index: %u, PD offset 0x%x\n",
>> @@ -2549,11 +2550,11 @@ static void i915_guc_client_info(struct
>> seq_file *m,
>>       seq_printf(m, "\tFailed doorbell: %u\n", client->b_fail);
>>       seq_printf(m, "\tLast submission result: %d\n", client->retcode);
>>
>> -    for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv) {
>> +    for_each_engine_id(engine, dev_priv, id) {
>> +        u64 submissions = client->submissions[id];
>> +        tot += submissions;
>>           seq_printf(m, "\tSubmissions: %llu %s\n",
>> -                client->submissions[engine->id],
>> -                engine->name);
>> -        tot += client->submissions[engine->id];
>> +                submissions, engine->name);
>>       }
>>       seq_printf(m, "\tTotal: %llu\n", tot);
>>   }
>> @@ -2598,11 +2599,11 @@ static int i915_guc_info(struct seq_file *m,
>> void *data)
>>       seq_printf(m, "GuC last action error code: %d\n", guc.action_err);
>>
>>       seq_printf(m, "\nGuC submissions:\n");
>> -    for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv) {
>> +    for_each_engine_id(engine, dev_priv, id) {
>> +        u64 submissions = guc.submissions[id];
>> +        total += submissions;
>>           seq_printf(m, "\t%-24s: %10llu, last seqno 0x%08x\n",
>> -            engine->name, guc.submissions[engine->id],
>> -            guc.last_seqno[engine->id]);
>> -        total += guc.submissions[engine->id];
>> +            engine->name, submissions, guc.last_seqno[id]);
>>       }
>>       seq_printf(m, "\t%s: %llu\n", "Total", total);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> index 6756db0..ece3479 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> @@ -342,7 +342,8 @@ static void guc_init_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>
>>       for_each_engine_masked(engine, dev_priv, client->engines) {
>>           struct intel_context *ce = &ctx->engine[engine->id];
>> -        struct guc_execlist_context *lrc = &desc.lrc[engine->guc_id];
>> +        uint32_t guc_engine_id = engine->guc_id;
>> +        struct guc_execlist_context *lrc = &desc.lrc[guc_engine_id];
>>           struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>>
>>           /* TODO: We have a design issue to be solved here. Only when we
>> @@ -361,7 +362,7 @@ static void guc_init_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>           gfx_addr = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(ce->state);
>>           lrc->ring_lcra = gfx_addr + LRC_STATE_PN * PAGE_SIZE;
>>           lrc->context_id = (client->ctx_index << GUC_ELC_CTXID_OFFSET) |
>> -                (engine->guc_id << GUC_ELC_ENGINE_OFFSET);
>> +                (guc_engine_id << GUC_ELC_ENGINE_OFFSET);
>>
>>           obj = ce->ringbuf->obj;
>>           gfx_addr = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj);
>> @@ -371,7 +372,7 @@ static void guc_init_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>           lrc->ring_next_free_location = gfx_addr;
>>           lrc->ring_current_tail_pointer_value = 0;
>>
>> -        desc.engines_used |= (1 << engine->guc_id);
>> +        desc.engines_used |= (1 << guc_engine_id);
>>       }
>>
>>       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Host engines 0x%x => GuC engines used 0x%x\n",
>> @@ -461,6 +462,7 @@ static void guc_add_workqueue_item(struct
>> i915_guc_client *gc,
>>       /* wqi_len is in DWords, and does not include the one-word
>> header */
>>       const size_t wqi_size = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
>>       const u32 wqi_len = wqi_size/sizeof(u32) - 1;
>> +    struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine;
>>       struct guc_process_desc *desc;
>>       struct guc_wq_item *wqi;
>>       void *base;
>> @@ -502,12 +504,11 @@ static void guc_add_workqueue_item(struct
>> i915_guc_client *gc,
>>       /* Now fill in the 4-word work queue item */
>>       wqi->header = WQ_TYPE_INORDER |
>>               (wqi_len << WQ_LEN_SHIFT) |
>> -            (rq->engine->guc_id << WQ_TARGET_SHIFT) |
>> +            (engine->guc_id << WQ_TARGET_SHIFT) |
>>               WQ_NO_WCFLUSH_WAIT;
>>
>>       /* The GuC wants only the low-order word of the context
>> descriptor */
>> -    wqi->context_desc = (u32)intel_lr_context_descriptor(rq->ctx,
>> -                                 rq->engine);
>> +    wqi->context_desc = (u32)intel_lr_context_descriptor(rq->ctx,
>> engine);
>>
>>       wqi->ring_tail = tail << WQ_RING_TAIL_SHIFT;
>>       wqi->fence_id = rq->fence.seqno;
>> @@ -1035,11 +1036,14 @@ int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   void i915_guc_submission_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   {
>>       struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
>> +    struct i915_guc_client **gc_ptr;
>>       struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>> +    enum intel_engine_id engine_id;
>>
>> -    for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv) {
>> -        guc_client_free(dev_priv, guc->exec_clients[engine->id]);
>> -        guc->exec_clients[engine->id] = NULL;
>> +    for_each_engine_id(engine, dev_priv, engine_id) {
>> +        gc_ptr = &guc->exec_clients[engine_id];
>> +        guc_client_free(dev_priv, *gc_ptr);
>> +        *gc_ptr = NULL;
>>       }
>>   }
>>
>>
>
> Didn't spot a difference from v1 which I reviewed before. What is new in
> v2?
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Regards,
> Tvrtko

Nothing different in this patch; it's v2 of the set, not of each patch 
within it. Notice in particular the presence of a cover letter (as it's 
more than a single patch), as agreed at yesterday's Tech Forum.

But I only found R-B's from you for v1 3/5 and 4/5; we discussed 1/5 and 
2/5 offline but AFAICT you didn't post an R-B for them?

.Dave.

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-22 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-21 18:15 [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915/guc: use one GuC client per GPU engine Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/guc: doorbell reset should avoid used doorbells Dave Gordon
2016-07-22 10:00   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-21 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/guc: refactor guc_init_doorbell_hw() Dave Gordon
2016-07-22 10:01   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-21 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/guc: use a separate GuC client for each engine Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 18:30   ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-22 10:23     ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-22 21:57       ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/guc: add engine mask to GuC client & pass to GuC Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/guc: use for_each_engine_id() where appropriate Dave Gordon
2016-07-22 10:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-22 10:45     ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2016-07-21 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/guc: re-optimise i915_guc_client layout Dave Gordon
2016-07-22 10:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-22  6:02 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc: use one GuC client per GPU engine Patchwork
2016-07-22 10:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-22 15:17     ` Dave Gordon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5791F955.5050300@intel.com \
    --to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox