[PATCH v4 0/3] drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level

public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level
@ 2016-07-21 18:27 Dave Gordon
  2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-07-21 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

A few adjustments to the messages emitted from the driver, promoting
or demoting them to the level most suited to the target audience as
well as the impact of the thing being reported.

Dave Gordon (3):
  drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
  drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
  drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 18 ++++++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c    | 34 +++++++++++++++---------------
 include/drm/drmP.h                         | 26 +++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/3] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
  2016-07-21 18:27 [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Dave Gordon
@ 2016-07-21 18:27 ` Dave Gordon
  2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN() Dave Gordon
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-07-21 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Dave Gordon, dri-devel, Tvrtko Ursulin

We had only DRM_INFO() and DRM_ERROR(), whereas the underlying printk()
provides several other useful intermediate levels such as NOTICE and
WARNING. So this patch fills out the set by providing both regular and
once-only macros for each of the levels INFO, NOTICE, and WARNING, using
a common underlying macro that does all the token-pasting.

DRM_ERROR is unchanged, as it's not just a printk wrapper.

v2:
    Fix whitespace, missing ## (Eric Engestrom)

Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
---
 include/drm/drmP.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h
index d377865..3669cdd 100644
--- a/include/drm/drmP.h
+++ b/include/drm/drmP.h
@@ -162,6 +162,26 @@ void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
 /** \name Macros to make printk easier */
 /*@{*/
 
+#define _DRM_PRINTK(once, level, fmt, ...)				\
+	do {								\
+		printk##once(KERN_##level "[" DRM_NAME "] " fmt,	\
+			     ##__VA_ARGS__);				\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define DRM_INFO(fmt, ...)						\
+	_DRM_PRINTK(, INFO, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define DRM_NOTE(fmt, ...)						\
+	_DRM_PRINTK(, NOTICE, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define DRM_WARN(fmt, ...)						\
+	_DRM_PRINTK(, WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+#define DRM_INFO_ONCE(fmt, ...)						\
+	_DRM_PRINTK(_once, INFO, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define DRM_NOTE_ONCE(fmt, ...)						\
+	_DRM_PRINTK(_once, NOTICE, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define DRM_WARN_ONCE(fmt, ...)						\
+	_DRM_PRINTK(_once, WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
 /**
  * Error output.
  *
@@ -187,12 +207,6 @@ void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
 		drm_err(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);				\
 })
 
-#define DRM_INFO(fmt, ...)				\
-	printk(KERN_INFO "[" DRM_NAME "] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-
-#define DRM_INFO_ONCE(fmt, ...)				\
-	printk_once(KERN_INFO "[" DRM_NAME "] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-
 /**
  * Debug output.
  *
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
  2016-07-21 18:27 [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Dave Gordon
  2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
@ 2016-07-21 18:27 ` Dave Gordon
  2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels Dave Gordon
  2016-07-22  6:25 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Patchwork
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-07-21 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Where we're going to continue regardless of the problem, rather than
fail, then the message should be a WARNing rather than an ERROR.

Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 18 +++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 01c1c16..ee4d346 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -114,10 +114,8 @@ static int host2guc_action(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 *data, u32 len)
 		if (ret != -ETIMEDOUT)
 			ret = -EIO;
 
-		DRM_ERROR("GUC: host2guc action 0x%X failed. ret=%d "
-				"status=0x%08X response=0x%08X\n",
-				data[0], ret, status,
-				I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15)));
+		DRM_WARN("Action 0x%X failed; ret=%d status=0x%08X response=0x%08X\n",
+			 data[0], ret, status, I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15)));
 
 		dev_priv->guc.action_fail += 1;
 		dev_priv->guc.action_err = ret;
@@ -553,8 +551,8 @@ static int guc_ring_doorbell(struct i915_guc_client *gc)
 		if (db_ret.db_status == GUC_DOORBELL_DISABLED)
 			break;
 
-		DRM_ERROR("Cookie mismatch. Expected %d, returned %d\n",
-			  db_cmp.cookie, db_ret.cookie);
+		DRM_WARN("Cookie mismatch. Expected %d, found %d\n",
+			 db_cmp.cookie, db_ret.cookie);
 
 		/* update the cookie to newly read cookie from GuC */
 		db_cmp.cookie = db_ret.cookie;
@@ -726,8 +724,8 @@ static void guc_init_doorbell_hw(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	/* Restore to original value */
 	err = guc_update_doorbell_id(guc, client, db_id);
 	if (err)
-		DRM_ERROR("Failed to restore doorbell to %d, err %d\n",
-			db_id, err);
+		DRM_WARN("Failed to restore doorbell to %d, err %d\n",
+			 db_id, err);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < GUC_MAX_DOORBELLS; ++i) {
 		i915_reg_t drbreg = GEN8_DRBREGL(i);
@@ -819,8 +817,6 @@ static void guc_init_doorbell_hw(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	return client;
 
 err:
-	DRM_ERROR("FAILED to create priority %u GuC client!\n", priority);
-
 	guc_client_free(dev_priv, client);
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -998,7 +994,7 @@ int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 				  GUC_CTX_PRIORITY_KMD_NORMAL,
 				  dev_priv->kernel_context);
 	if (!client) {
-		DRM_ERROR("Failed to create execbuf guc_client\n");
+		DRM_ERROR("Failed to create normal GuC client!\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
  2016-07-21 18:27 [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Dave Gordon
  2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
  2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN() Dave Gordon
@ 2016-07-21 18:27 ` Dave Gordon
  2016-07-22  6:25 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Patchwork
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-07-21 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Some downgraded from DRM_ERROR() to DRM_WARN() or DRM_NOTE(),
a few upgraded from DRM_INFO() to DRM_NOTE() or DRM_WARN(),
and one eliminated completely.

v2: different permutation of levels :)
v3: convert a couple of "this shouldn't happen" messages to WARN()

Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index b883efd..61bbf20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -140,12 +140,14 @@ static u32 get_gttype(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
 static u32 get_core_family(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	switch (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen) {
+	u32 gen = INTEL_GEN(dev_priv);
+
+	switch (gen) {
 	case 9:
 		return GFXCORE_FAMILY_GEN9;
 
 	default:
-		DRM_ERROR("GUC: unsupported core family\n");
+		WARN(1, "GEN%d does not support GuC operation!\n", gen);
 		return GFXCORE_FAMILY_UNKNOWN;
 	}
 }
@@ -435,7 +437,7 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
 		goto fail;
 	} else if (*fw_path == '\0') {
 		/* Device has a GuC but we don't know what f/w to load? */
-		DRM_INFO("No GuC firmware known for this platform\n");
+		WARN(1, "No GuC firmware known for this platform!\n");
 		err = -ENODEV;
 		goto fail;
 	}
@@ -473,10 +475,8 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
 		 * that the state and timing are fairly predictable
 		 */
 		err = i915_reset_guc(dev_priv);
-		if (err) {
-			DRM_ERROR("GuC reset failed: %d\n", err);
+		if (err)
 			goto fail;
-		}
 
 		err = guc_ucode_xfer(dev_priv);
 		if (!err)
@@ -534,15 +534,15 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
 	else if (err == 0)
 		DRM_INFO("GuC firmware load skipped\n");
 	else if (ret != -EIO)
-		DRM_INFO("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
+		DRM_NOTE("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
 	else
-		DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
+		DRM_WARN("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
 
 	if (i915.enable_guc_submission) {
 		if (fw_path == NULL)
 			DRM_INFO("GuC submission without firmware not supported\n");
 		if (ret == 0)
-			DRM_INFO("Falling back from GuC submission to execlist mode\n");
+			DRM_NOTE("Falling back from GuC submission to execlist mode\n");
 		else
 			DRM_ERROR("GuC init failed: %d\n", ret);
 	}
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
 
 	/* Check the size of the blob before examining buffer contents */
 	if (fw->size < sizeof(struct guc_css_header)) {
-		DRM_ERROR("Firmware header is missing\n");
+		DRM_NOTE("Firmware header is missing\n");
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
 		css->key_size_dw - css->exponent_size_dw) * sizeof(u32);
 
 	if (guc_fw->header_size != sizeof(struct guc_css_header)) {
-		DRM_ERROR("CSS header definition mismatch\n");
+		DRM_NOTE("CSS header definition mismatch\n");
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
 
 	/* now RSA */
 	if (css->key_size_dw != UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT) {
-		DRM_ERROR("RSA key size is bad\n");
+		DRM_NOTE("RSA key size is bad\n");
 		goto fail;
 	}
 	guc_fw->rsa_offset = guc_fw->ucode_offset + guc_fw->ucode_size;
@@ -604,14 +604,14 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
 	/* At least, it should have header, uCode and RSA. Size of all three. */
 	size = guc_fw->header_size + guc_fw->ucode_size + guc_fw->rsa_size;
 	if (fw->size < size) {
-		DRM_ERROR("Missing firmware components\n");
+		DRM_NOTE("Missing firmware components\n");
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
 	/* Header and uCode will be loaded to WOPCM. Size of the two. */
 	size = guc_fw->header_size + guc_fw->ucode_size;
 	if (size > guc_wopcm_size(to_i915(dev))) {
-		DRM_ERROR("Firmware is too large to fit in WOPCM\n");
+		DRM_NOTE("Firmware is too large to fit in WOPCM\n");
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
 
 	if (guc_fw->guc_fw_major_found != guc_fw->guc_fw_major_wanted ||
 	    guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_found < guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_wanted) {
-		DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware version %d.%d, required %d.%d\n",
+		DRM_NOTE("GuC firmware version %d.%d, required %d.%d\n",
 			guc_fw->guc_fw_major_found, guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_found,
 			guc_fw->guc_fw_major_wanted, guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_wanted);
 		err = -ENOEXEC;
@@ -656,10 +656,10 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
 	return;
 
 fail:
+	DRM_WARN("Failed to fetch valid GuC firmware from %s (error %d)\n",
+		 guc_fw->guc_fw_path, err);
 	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GuC fw fetch status FAIL; err %d, fw %p, obj %p\n",
 		err, fw, guc_fw->guc_fw_obj);
-	DRM_ERROR("Failed to fetch GuC firmware from %s (error %d)\n",
-		  guc_fw->guc_fw_path, err);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	obj = guc_fw->guc_fw_obj;
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level
  2016-07-21 18:27 [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Dave Gordon
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels Dave Gordon
@ 2016-07-22  6:25 ` Patchwork
  2016-07-22 10:59   ` Dave Gordon
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-07-22  6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Gordon; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10150/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Series 10150v1 drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/10150/revisions/1/mbox

Test gem_sync:
        Subgroup basic-store-each:
                pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (ro-bdw-i7-5600u)

fi-hsw-i7-4770k  total:244  pass:216  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:20 
fi-kbl-qkkr      total:244  pass:180  dwarn:27  dfail:1   fail:9   skip:27 
fi-skl-i5-6260u  total:244  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:12 
fi-skl-i7-6700k  total:244  pass:210  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:26 
fi-snb-i7-2600   total:244  pass:196  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:40 
ro-bdw-i5-5250u  total:244  pass:219  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:13 
ro-bdw-i7-5557U  total:244  pass:221  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:14 
ro-bdw-i7-5600u  total:244  pass:203  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:8   skip:32 
ro-bsw-n3050     total:218  pass:173  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:2   skip:42 
ro-byt-n2820     total:244  pass:197  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:9   skip:38 
ro-hsw-i3-4010u  total:244  pass:212  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:24 
ro-hsw-i7-4770r  total:244  pass:212  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:24 
ro-ilk-i7-620lm  total:244  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:9   skip:63 
ro-ilk1-i5-650   total:239  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:9   skip:58 
ro-ivb-i7-3770   total:244  pass:203  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:33 
ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:244  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:12 
ro-snb-i7-2620M  total:244  pass:193  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:9   skip:42 

Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1566/

cf82f46 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-07m-21d-20h-43m-36s UTC integration manifest
5c44b9b drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
50ffd43 drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
900ee7b drm: extra printk() wrapper macros

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level
  2016-07-22  6:25 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Patchwork
@ 2016-07-22 10:59   ` Dave Gordon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-07-22 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On 22/07/16 07:25, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10150/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 10150v1 drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/10150/revisions/1/mbox
>
> Test gem_sync:
>          Subgroup basic-store-each:
>                  pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (ro-bdw-i7-5600u)

The now-familiar https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
Bug 96974 - [BAT BDW] gem_sync / basic-store-each fails sporadically
Though it looks like Chris may have a fix for this :)

.Dave.

> fi-hsw-i7-4770k  total:244  pass:216  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:20
> fi-kbl-qkkr      total:244  pass:180  dwarn:27  dfail:1   fail:9   skip:27
> fi-skl-i5-6260u  total:244  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:12
> fi-skl-i7-6700k  total:244  pass:210  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:26
> fi-snb-i7-2600   total:244  pass:196  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:40
> ro-bdw-i5-5250u  total:244  pass:219  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:13
> ro-bdw-i7-5557U  total:244  pass:221  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:14
> ro-bdw-i7-5600u  total:244  pass:203  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:8   skip:32
> ro-bsw-n3050     total:218  pass:173  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:2   skip:42
> ro-byt-n2820     total:244  pass:197  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:9   skip:38
> ro-hsw-i3-4010u  total:244  pass:212  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:24
> ro-hsw-i7-4770r  total:244  pass:212  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:24
> ro-ilk-i7-620lm  total:244  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:9   skip:63
> ro-ilk1-i5-650   total:239  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:9   skip:58
> ro-ivb-i7-3770   total:244  pass:203  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:33
> ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:244  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:12
> ro-snb-i7-2620M  total:244  pass:193  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:9   skip:42
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1566/
>
> cf82f46 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-07m-21d-20h-43m-36s UTC integration manifest
> 5c44b9b drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
> 50ffd43 drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
> 900ee7b drm: extra printk() wrapper macros


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-22 10:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-21 18:27 [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN() Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 18:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels Dave Gordon
2016-07-22  6:25 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: emit (drm) messages at the most appropriate level Patchwork
2016-07-22 10:59   ` Dave Gordon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox