* [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation [not found] <mailto:20161013131629.GO20761@phenom.ffwll.local> @ 2016-10-25 9:10 ` meghanelogal 2016-10-25 10:10 ` Chris Wilson 2016-10-26 6:39 ` Daniel Vetter 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: meghanelogal @ 2016-10-25 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx, daniel.vetter, chris, rodrigo.vivi Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, meghanelogal Existing DDB algorithm divide the DDB wrt data rate, hence the planes with the less height but same width will be allocated less blocks and watermark are based on width which requires more DDB. With this data the flip may fail. In new DDB algorithm, the DDB is divided based on watermark requirement. In this subtest, dividing the htotal/200 will allocate ~2-4 blocks out of total(512/896), flip may fail with the exisiting algorithm.But with the new algorithm it will pass. Signed-off-by: Megha Nelogal <megha.i.nelogal@intel.com> --- tests/kms_atomic.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/kms_atomic.c b/tests/kms_atomic.c index f27ee46..bfa4b35 100644 --- a/tests/kms_atomic.c +++ b/tests/kms_atomic.c @@ -1280,6 +1280,60 @@ static void atomic_invalid_params(struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc, do_ioctl_err(desc->fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATOMIC, &ioc, EFAULT); } +static void validate_dbuf(struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc, + struct kms_atomic_plane_state **plane_array, + int plane_count) +{ + int i; + struct kms_atomic_desc *desc = crtc->state->desc; + + /* for active crtc do modeset on the native resolution */ + drmModeAtomicReq *req = drmModeAtomicAlloc(); + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *mode = crtc->mode.data; + struct kms_atomic_plane_state plane; + struct igt_fb fb; + + crtc_populate_req(crtc, req); + + /* Add plane data to the structure...*/ + uint32_t crtc_x = 0; + uint32_t crtc_y = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < plane_count; i++) { + plane = *plane_array[i]; + uint32_t format = plane_get_igt_format(&plane); + + igt_require(format != 0); + plane.src_x = 0; + plane.src_y = 0; + plane.src_w = (mode->hdisplay / (1)) << 16; + plane.crtc_x = crtc_x; + plane.crtc_y = crtc_y; + plane.crtc_w = (mode->hdisplay) / (1); + plane.crtc_h = (mode->vdisplay) / (i + 1); + + plane.crtc_id = crtc->obj; + + if (i%2 == 0) { + plane.src_h = (mode->vdisplay / (1)) << 16; + plane.crtc_h = (mode->vdisplay) / (1); + } + + if (i%2 == 1) { + plane.src_h = ceil((mode->vdisplay / 200) << 16); + plane.crtc_h = ceil((mode->vdisplay / 200)); + } + + plane.fb_id = igt_create_fb(plane.state->desc->fd, + plane.crtc_w, plane.crtc_h, + format, I915_TILING_NONE, &fb); + plane_populate_req(&plane, req); + } + do_atomic_commit(desc->fd, req, ATOMIC_RELAX_NONE); + drmModeAtomicFree(req); +} + + igt_main { struct kms_atomic_desc desc; @@ -1373,6 +1427,34 @@ igt_main atomic_state_free(scratch); } + igt_subtest("validate_dbuf") { + int gen; + + gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(desc.fd)); + igt_require(gen >= 9); + + struct kms_atomic_state *scratch = atomic_state_dup(current); + struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc = find_crtc(scratch, true); + struct kms_atomic_plane_state *plane; + struct kms_atomic_connector_state *connector = + find_connector(scratch, crtc); + struct kms_atomic_plane_state **plane_array = NULL; + /* Enabling Two planes */ + plane_array = calloc(2, sizeof(struct kms_atomic_plane_state *)); + int plane_count = 0; + + igt_require(crtc); + plane = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, crtc); + igt_require(plane); + plane_array[plane_count] = plane; plane_count++; + plane = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY, crtc); + igt_require(plane); + plane_array[plane_count] = plane; plane_count++; + igt_require(connector); + validate_dbuf(crtc, plane_array, plane_count); + atomic_state_free(scratch); + } + atomic_state_free(current); igt_fixture -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation 2016-10-25 9:10 ` [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation meghanelogal @ 2016-10-25 10:10 ` Chris Wilson 2016-10-26 6:39 ` Daniel Vetter 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2016-10-25 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: meghanelogal; +Cc: daniel.vetter, intel-gfx, paulo.r.zanoni, rodrigo.vivi On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:40:00PM +0530, meghanelogal wrote: > + igt_subtest("validate_dbuf") { > + int gen; > + > + gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(desc.fd)); > + igt_require(gen >= 9); > + > + struct kms_atomic_state *scratch = atomic_state_dup(current); > + struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc = find_crtc(scratch, true); > + struct kms_atomic_plane_state *plane; > + struct kms_atomic_connector_state *connector = > + find_connector(scratch, crtc); > + struct kms_atomic_plane_state **plane_array = NULL; > + /* Enabling Two planes */ > + plane_array = calloc(2, sizeof(struct kms_atomic_plane_state *)); > + int plane_count = 0; > + > + igt_require(crtc); > + plane = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, crtc); > + igt_require(plane); > + plane_array[plane_count] = plane; plane_count++; > + plane = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY, crtc); > + igt_require(plane); > + plane_array[plane_count] = plane; plane_count++; > + igt_require(connector); > + validate_dbuf(crtc, plane_array, plane_count); > + atomic_state_free(scratch); struct kms_atomic_state *scratch = atomic_state_dup(current); struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc; struct kms_atomic_plane_state *planes[2]; crtc = find_crtc(scratch, true); igt_require(crtc); igt_require(find_connector(scratch, crtc)); planes[0] = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, crtc); igt_require(planes[0]); planes[1] = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY, crtc); igt_require(planes[1]); validate_dbuf(crtc, planes, 2); atomic_state_free(scratch); is a bit easier to read. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation 2016-10-25 9:10 ` [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation meghanelogal 2016-10-25 10:10 ` Chris Wilson @ 2016-10-26 6:39 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-10-26 8:40 ` meghanelogal 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2016-10-26 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: meghanelogal; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, daniel.vetter, intel-gfx, rodrigo.vivi On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:40:00PM +0530, meghanelogal wrote: > Existing DDB algorithm divide the DDB wrt data rate, > hence the planes with the less height but same width > will be allocated less blocks and watermark are based > on width which requires more DDB. With this data the flip > may fail. > > In new DDB algorithm, the DDB is divided based on > watermark requirement. > > In this subtest, dividing the htotal/200 will allocate > ~2-4 blocks out of total(512/896), flip may fail with the > exisiting algorithm.But with the new algorithm it will pass. > > Signed-off-by: Megha Nelogal <megha.i.nelogal@intel.com> Pretty sure I mentioned this already, but how does this test work? It doesn't check for a specific platform/hw combo to make sure it's assumptions are valid, and you can't just assume that this will always work on all drivers/platforms. tbh not entirely sure of the value this provides here ... -Daniel > --- > tests/kms_atomic.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/kms_atomic.c b/tests/kms_atomic.c > index f27ee46..bfa4b35 100644 > --- a/tests/kms_atomic.c > +++ b/tests/kms_atomic.c > @@ -1280,6 +1280,60 @@ static void atomic_invalid_params(struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc, > do_ioctl_err(desc->fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATOMIC, &ioc, EFAULT); > } > > +static void validate_dbuf(struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc, > + struct kms_atomic_plane_state **plane_array, > + int plane_count) > +{ > + int i; > + struct kms_atomic_desc *desc = crtc->state->desc; > + > + /* for active crtc do modeset on the native resolution */ > + drmModeAtomicReq *req = drmModeAtomicAlloc(); > + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *mode = crtc->mode.data; > + struct kms_atomic_plane_state plane; > + struct igt_fb fb; > + > + crtc_populate_req(crtc, req); > + > + /* Add plane data to the structure...*/ > + uint32_t crtc_x = 0; > + uint32_t crtc_y = 0; > + > + for (i = 0; i < plane_count; i++) { > + plane = *plane_array[i]; > + uint32_t format = plane_get_igt_format(&plane); > + > + igt_require(format != 0); > + plane.src_x = 0; > + plane.src_y = 0; > + plane.src_w = (mode->hdisplay / (1)) << 16; > + plane.crtc_x = crtc_x; > + plane.crtc_y = crtc_y; > + plane.crtc_w = (mode->hdisplay) / (1); > + plane.crtc_h = (mode->vdisplay) / (i + 1); > + > + plane.crtc_id = crtc->obj; > + > + if (i%2 == 0) { > + plane.src_h = (mode->vdisplay / (1)) << 16; > + plane.crtc_h = (mode->vdisplay) / (1); > + } > + > + if (i%2 == 1) { > + plane.src_h = ceil((mode->vdisplay / 200) << 16); > + plane.crtc_h = ceil((mode->vdisplay / 200)); > + } > + > + plane.fb_id = igt_create_fb(plane.state->desc->fd, > + plane.crtc_w, plane.crtc_h, > + format, I915_TILING_NONE, &fb); > + plane_populate_req(&plane, req); > + } > + do_atomic_commit(desc->fd, req, ATOMIC_RELAX_NONE); > + drmModeAtomicFree(req); > +} > + > + > igt_main > { > struct kms_atomic_desc desc; > @@ -1373,6 +1427,34 @@ igt_main > atomic_state_free(scratch); > } > > + igt_subtest("validate_dbuf") { > + int gen; > + > + gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(desc.fd)); > + igt_require(gen >= 9); > + > + struct kms_atomic_state *scratch = atomic_state_dup(current); > + struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc = find_crtc(scratch, true); > + struct kms_atomic_plane_state *plane; > + struct kms_atomic_connector_state *connector = > + find_connector(scratch, crtc); > + struct kms_atomic_plane_state **plane_array = NULL; > + /* Enabling Two planes */ > + plane_array = calloc(2, sizeof(struct kms_atomic_plane_state *)); > + int plane_count = 0; > + > + igt_require(crtc); > + plane = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, crtc); > + igt_require(plane); > + plane_array[plane_count] = plane; plane_count++; > + plane = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY, crtc); > + igt_require(plane); > + plane_array[plane_count] = plane; plane_count++; > + igt_require(connector); > + validate_dbuf(crtc, plane_array, plane_count); > + atomic_state_free(scratch); > + } > + > atomic_state_free(current); > > igt_fixture > -- > 1.9.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation 2016-10-26 6:39 ` Daniel Vetter @ 2016-10-26 8:40 ` meghanelogal 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: meghanelogal @ 2016-10-26 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, daniel.vetter, intel-gfx, rodrigo.vivi Daniel, I have already added platform check and is valid for platforms>=gen 9 This subtest is for Watermark/DDB kernel patches floated by Mahesh Kumar .. reference -> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/12222/ Regards, Megha On Wednesday 26 October 2016 12:09 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:40:00PM +0530, meghanelogal wrote: >> Existing DDB algorithm divide the DDB wrt data rate, >> hence the planes with the less height but same width >> will be allocated less blocks and watermark are based >> on width which requires more DDB. With this data the flip >> may fail. >> >> In new DDB algorithm, the DDB is divided based on >> watermark requirement. >> >> In this subtest, dividing the htotal/200 will allocate >> ~2-4 blocks out of total(512/896), flip may fail with the >> exisiting algorithm.But with the new algorithm it will pass. >> >> Signed-off-by: Megha Nelogal <megha.i.nelogal@intel.com> > Pretty sure I mentioned this already, but how does this test work? It > doesn't check for a specific platform/hw combo to make sure it's > assumptions are valid, and you can't just assume that this will always > work on all drivers/platforms. > > tbh not entirely sure of the value this provides here ... > -Daniel > >> --- >> tests/kms_atomic.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tests/kms_atomic.c b/tests/kms_atomic.c >> index f27ee46..bfa4b35 100644 >> --- a/tests/kms_atomic.c >> +++ b/tests/kms_atomic.c >> @@ -1280,6 +1280,60 @@ static void atomic_invalid_params(struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc, >> do_ioctl_err(desc->fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATOMIC, &ioc, EFAULT); >> } >> >> +static void validate_dbuf(struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc, >> + struct kms_atomic_plane_state **plane_array, >> + int plane_count) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + struct kms_atomic_desc *desc = crtc->state->desc; >> + >> + /* for active crtc do modeset on the native resolution */ >> + drmModeAtomicReq *req = drmModeAtomicAlloc(); >> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *mode = crtc->mode.data; >> + struct kms_atomic_plane_state plane; >> + struct igt_fb fb; >> + >> + crtc_populate_req(crtc, req); >> + >> + /* Add plane data to the structure...*/ >> + uint32_t crtc_x = 0; >> + uint32_t crtc_y = 0; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < plane_count; i++) { >> + plane = *plane_array[i]; >> + uint32_t format = plane_get_igt_format(&plane); >> + >> + igt_require(format != 0); >> + plane.src_x = 0; >> + plane.src_y = 0; >> + plane.src_w = (mode->hdisplay / (1)) << 16; >> + plane.crtc_x = crtc_x; >> + plane.crtc_y = crtc_y; >> + plane.crtc_w = (mode->hdisplay) / (1); >> + plane.crtc_h = (mode->vdisplay) / (i + 1); >> + >> + plane.crtc_id = crtc->obj; >> + >> + if (i%2 == 0) { >> + plane.src_h = (mode->vdisplay / (1)) << 16; >> + plane.crtc_h = (mode->vdisplay) / (1); >> + } >> + >> + if (i%2 == 1) { >> + plane.src_h = ceil((mode->vdisplay / 200) << 16); >> + plane.crtc_h = ceil((mode->vdisplay / 200)); >> + } >> + >> + plane.fb_id = igt_create_fb(plane.state->desc->fd, >> + plane.crtc_w, plane.crtc_h, >> + format, I915_TILING_NONE, &fb); >> + plane_populate_req(&plane, req); >> + } >> + do_atomic_commit(desc->fd, req, ATOMIC_RELAX_NONE); >> + drmModeAtomicFree(req); >> +} >> + >> + >> igt_main >> { >> struct kms_atomic_desc desc; >> @@ -1373,6 +1427,34 @@ igt_main >> atomic_state_free(scratch); >> } >> >> + igt_subtest("validate_dbuf") { >> + int gen; >> + >> + gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(desc.fd)); >> + igt_require(gen >= 9); >> + >> + struct kms_atomic_state *scratch = atomic_state_dup(current); >> + struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc = find_crtc(scratch, true); >> + struct kms_atomic_plane_state *plane; >> + struct kms_atomic_connector_state *connector = >> + find_connector(scratch, crtc); >> + struct kms_atomic_plane_state **plane_array = NULL; >> + /* Enabling Two planes */ >> + plane_array = calloc(2, sizeof(struct kms_atomic_plane_state *)); >> + int plane_count = 0; >> + >> + igt_require(crtc); >> + plane = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, crtc); >> + igt_require(plane); >> + plane_array[plane_count] = plane; plane_count++; >> + plane = find_plane(scratch, PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY, crtc); >> + igt_require(plane); >> + plane_array[plane_count] = plane; plane_count++; >> + igt_require(connector); >> + validate_dbuf(crtc, plane_array, plane_count); >> + atomic_state_free(scratch); >> + } >> + >> atomic_state_free(current); >> >> igt_fixture >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-26 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <mailto:20161013131629.GO20761@phenom.ffwll.local>
2016-10-25 9:10 ` [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation meghanelogal
2016-10-25 10:10 ` Chris Wilson
2016-10-26 6:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-26 8:40 ` meghanelogal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).