intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Praveen Paneri <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Zhe Wang <zhe1.wang@intel.com>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:47:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <582B0B07.1090208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115100742.GH30410@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>

Hi Chris,

On Tuesday 15 November 2016 03:37 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:36:34AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 15/11/2016 06:40, Praveen Paneri wrote:
>>> Decoupled MMIO is an alternative way to access forcewake domain
>>> registers, which requires less cycles for a single read/write and
>>> avoids frequent software forcewake.
>>> This certainly gives advantage over the forcewake as this new
>>> mechanism “decouples” CPU cycles and allow them to complete even
>>> when GT is in a CPD (frequency change) or C6 state.
>>>
>>> This can co-exist with forcewake and we will continue to use forcewake
>>> as appropriate. E.g. 64-bit register writes to avoid writing 2 dwords
>>> separately and land into funny situations.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Moved platform check out of the function and got rid of duplicate
>>> functions to find out decoupled power domain (Chris)
>>> - Added a check for forcewake already held and skipped decoupled
>>> access (Chris)
>>> - Skipped writing 64 bit registers through decoupled MMIO (Chris)
>>>
>>> v3:
>>> - Improved commit message with more info on decoupled mmio (Tvrtko)
>>> - Changed decoupled operation to enum and used u32 instead of
>>> uint_32 data type for register offset (Tvrtko)
>>> - Moved HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO to device info (Tvrtko)
>>> - Added lookup table for converting fw_engine to pd_engine (Tvrtko)
>>> - Improved __gen9_decoupled_read and __gen9_decoupled_write
>>> routines (Tvrtko)
>>>
>>> v4:
>>> - Fixed alignment and variable names (Chris)
>>> - Write GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1 register in just one go (Zhe Wang)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhe Wang <zhe1.wang@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Praveen Paneri <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |  18 +++++-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c     |   1 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |   7 +++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> index 4e7148a..158f05c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> @@ -549,6 +549,18 @@ enum forcewake_domains {
>>> #define FW_REG_READ  (1)
>>> #define FW_REG_WRITE (2)
>>>
>>> +enum decoupled_power_domain {
>>> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_BLITTER = 0,
>>> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_RENDER,
>>> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_MEDIA,
>>> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +enum decoupled_ops {
>>> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_WRITE = 0,
>>> +	GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_READ
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> enum forcewake_domains
>>> intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>> 			       i915_reg_t reg, unsigned int op);
>>> @@ -683,7 +695,8 @@ struct intel_csr {
>>> 	func(cursor_needs_physical); \
>>> 	func(hws_needs_physical); \
>>> 	func(overlay_needs_physical); \
>>> -	func(supports_tv)
>>> +	func(supports_tv); \
>>> +	func(has_decoupled_mmio)
>>>
>>> struct sseu_dev_info {
>>> 	u8 slice_mask;
>>> @@ -2652,6 +2665,9 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
>>> #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
>>> #define GEN9_FREQ_SCALER 3
>>>
>>> +#define HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO(dev) (INTEL_INFO(dev)->has_decoupled_mmio \
>>> +		&& IS_BXT_REVID(dev, BXT_REVID_C0, REVID_FOREVER))
>>> +
>>
>> Looks like I've missed this before, but Would you mind renaming the
>> dev argument to dev_priv?
>
> And whilst you are there, fix up the code to set
> info->has_decoupled_mmio = false when santizing.
> -Chris
but dev_priv->info is declared as const.

Praveen
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-15 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-06  5:24 [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO Praveen Paneri
2016-09-06  5:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2016-09-06  6:36 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2016-09-19 17:05   ` Praveen Paneri
2016-09-19 17:15     ` [PATCH v2] " Praveen Paneri
2016-09-23  9:49       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-09-26 11:08         ` Paneri, Praveen
2016-09-26 20:23           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-10-04 15:46             ` [PATCH v3] " Praveen Paneri
2016-10-04 17:43               ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2016-10-04 19:56               ` Chris Wilson
2016-10-05  3:17                 ` Praveen Paneri
2016-10-05  6:24                 ` Praveen Paneri
2016-11-15  6:40                 ` [PATCH v4] " Praveen Paneri
2016-11-15  9:36                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-15 10:07                     ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 13:17                       ` Praveen Paneri [this message]
2016-11-15 14:44                         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-15 17:19                           ` [PATCH v5] " Praveen Paneri
2016-11-16  8:25                             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-16  9:03                               ` Praveen Paneri
2016-11-16  9:08                                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-16  9:18                                   ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 10:56                     ` [PATCH v4] " Praveen Paneri
2016-11-15 10:59                       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-10-05 13:50               ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-10-10 17:03             ` [PATCH v2] " Carlos Santa
2016-09-19 17:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO (rev2) Patchwork
2016-10-04 16:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO (rev3) Patchwork
2016-11-15  7:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO (rev4) Patchwork
2016-11-15 18:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO (rev5) Patchwork
2016-11-16  9:38   ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=582B0B07.1090208@intel.com \
    --to=praveen.paneri@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhe1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).