public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>,
	Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for IGT PMU support (rev18)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:09:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59bf7691-6281-2753-5535-78ca6e82dc3b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171122143949.rkmzmhrqlrgniuee@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>


On 22/11/2017 14:39, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 02:31:08PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:

[snip]

>>
>> fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
>>
>> shard-hsw        total:2667 pass:1473 dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:11  skip:1181 time:9509s
>> shard-snb        total:2649 pass:1241 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:11  skip:1395 time:7972s
>> Blacklisted hosts:
>> shard-apl        total:2631 pass:1591 dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:24  skip:1012 time:12761s
>>
>> == Logs ==
>>
>> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_520/shards.html
> 
> 
> shards-all.html shows perf_pmu tests getting a SKIP across the board,
> on SNB, HSW and APL. igt@perf_pmu@multi-client-vcs1 on APL being the
> only exception but that's just a notrun (due to a hang earlier in that
> particular shard).

After some head scratching Chris suggested that drm-tip at the time when 
this run did not yet contain the PMU patches.

However on a subsequent runs some lockdep issue surfaced so its not like 
all is good after all.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-10  9:29 [PATCH v4 i-g-t 0/7] IGT PMU support Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/9] intel-gpu-overlay: Move local perf implementation to a library Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-11-21 19:34   ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/9] intel-gpu-overlay: Consolidate perf PMU access to library Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 12:21   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/9] lib/perf: Fix data types and general tidy Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 12:22   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/9] intel-gpu-overlay: Fix interrupts PMU readout Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 12:23   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-10 14:17     ` [PATCH i-g-t v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 5/9] intel-gpu-overlay: Catch-up to new i915 PMU Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-11-21 18:20   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 6/9] intel-gpu-overlay: Use RAPL PMU for power reading Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 11:30   ` [PATCH i-g-t v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 12:05     ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 12:25       ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-21 19:35       ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 7/9] tests/perf_pmu: Tests for i915 PMU API Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 12:37   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-10 13:38     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 13:46       ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-10 14:17         ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10 16:39           ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-11 12:54             ` [PATCH i-g-t v7 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-11-21 11:50               ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-21 18:21               ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-11-21 19:36                 ` [PATCH i-g-t v9 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 8/9] gem_wsim: Busy stats balancers Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-11-21 19:37   ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-10-10  9:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t 9/9] media-bench.pl: Add busy balancers to the list Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-11-21 11:51   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-10  9:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for IGT PMU support (rev7) Patchwork
2017-10-10 12:06 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for IGT PMU support (rev8) Patchwork
2017-10-10 13:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for IGT PMU support (rev9) Patchwork
2017-10-10 15:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for IGT PMU support (rev8) Patchwork
2017-10-10 18:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for IGT PMU support (rev11) Patchwork
2017-10-11  1:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-10-11 14:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for IGT PMU support (rev12) Patchwork
2017-10-11 20:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-11-22 11:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for IGT PMU support (rev18) Patchwork
2017-11-22 11:57   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-11-22 12:47     ` Petri Latvala
2017-11-22 14:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-11-22 14:39   ` Petri Latvala
2017-11-22 14:50     ` Petri Latvala
2017-11-22 17:09     ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59bf7691-6281-2753-5535-78ca6e82dc3b@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
    --cc=tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox