From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/execlists: Use coherent writes into the context image
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:12:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f63bf2f-6b8d-7491-a26c-c18cba2024f6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153691330743.23741.371785054285403111@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On 14/09/2018 09:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-09-14 09:14:54)
>>
>> On 13/09/2018 20:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>>> index d7fcbba8e982..7b1f322f232b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>>> @@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ static int __context_pin(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, struct i915_vma *vma)
>>> * on an active context (which by nature is already on the GPU).
>>> */
>>> if (!(vma->flags & I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND)) {
>>> - err = i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(vma->obj, true);
>>> + err = i915_gem_object_set_to_wc_domain(vma->obj, true);
>>
>> I am still confused by this. Cache flushing effects of the old and new
>> call seem the same due object being in CPU write domain at this point.
>> What changes is that it will be marked differently from this point one.
>> Does that come into play later in the objects lifetime and where?
>
> No, just taking the opportunity to use a more correct domain now that it
> exists and logically ties in with using WC.
Ok.
>>> if (err)
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1322,7 +1322,9 @@ __execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto err;
>>>
>>> - vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(ce->state->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
>>> + vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(ce->state->obj,
>>> + i915_coherent_map_type(ctx->i915) |
>>> + I915_MAP_OVERRIDE);
>>
>> Override MAP_WB from populate_lr_context - OK I think.
>>
>>> if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
>>> ret = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
>>> goto unpin_vma;
>>> @@ -2753,7 +2755,7 @@ populate_lr_context(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
>>> void *defaults;
>>>
>>> defaults = i915_gem_object_pin_map(engine->default_state,
>>> - I915_MAP_WB);
>>> + I915_MAP_FORCE_WB);
>>> if (IS_ERR(defaults)) {
>>> ret = PTR_ERR(defaults);
>>> goto err_unpin_ctx;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
>>> index d0ef50bf930a..1eb68d77b66c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
>>> @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ alloc_context_vma(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>> }
>>>
>>> defaults = i915_gem_object_pin_map(engine->default_state,
>>> - I915_MAP_WB);
>>> + I915_MAP_FORCE_WB);
>>> if (IS_ERR(defaults)) {
>>> err = PTR_ERR(defaults);
>>> goto err_map;
>>>
>>
>> These two do not need to be changed AFAICT.
>
> I think we cannot rely on engine->default_state always being MAP_WB
> already at this point, due to not having an idle cycle between creation
> of engine->default_state on module_load and first use.
>
> Having thought of that last night, I did mean to add a call to
> __i915_gem_park() during init so we forced ourselves to idle.
I don't follow - all places where we map it use MAP_WB. Isn't force flag
just to override the existing different mapping?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-14 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-13 17:32 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/execlists: Delay updating ring register state after resume Chris Wilson
2018-09-13 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/execlists: Use coherent writes into the context image Chris Wilson
2018-09-13 19:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
2018-09-14 8:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-09-14 8:21 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-14 9:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-09-14 9:17 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-14 9:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-09-13 17:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/execlists: Delay updating ring register state after resume Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-09-13 17:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2018-09-13 18:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-09-13 20:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/execlists: Delay updating ring register state after resume (rev2) Patchwork
2018-09-13 20:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-09-13 23:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f63bf2f-6b8d-7491-a26c-c18cba2024f6@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).