[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/28] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes.

Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21T10:37:18Z

Now that we require locking to evict, multiple vmas from the same object
might not be evicted. This is expected and required, because execbuf will
move to short-term pinning by using the lock only. This will cause these
tests to fail, because they create a ton of vma's for the same object.

Unbind manually to prevent spurious -ENOSPC in those mock tests.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
index 1f10fe36619b..5c5809dfe9b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
@@ -691,7 +691,11 @@ static int igt_vma_rotate_remap(void *arg)
}

i915_vma_unpin(vma);
-
+ err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+ goto out_object;
+ }
cond_resched();
}
}
@@ -848,6 +852,11 @@ static int igt_vma_partial(void *arg)

i915_vma_unpin(vma);
nvma++;
+ err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+ goto out_object;
+ }

cond_resched();
}
@@ -882,6 +891,12 @@ static int igt_vma_partial(void *arg)

i915_vma_unpin(vma);

+ err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+ goto out_object;
+ }
+
count = 0;
list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma.list, obj_link)
count++;
--
2.33.0