From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 08/20] drm/i915/cdclk: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for()
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:20:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d50031411d5517508867d4b595ce90a2b44073b.1756383233.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1756383233.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
Prefer generic poll helpers over i915 custom helpers.
The functional change is losing the exponentially growing sleep of
wait_for(), which used to be 10, 20, 40, ..., 640, and 1280 us.
Use an arbitrary constant 500 us sleep instead. The timeout remains at
50 ms.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 37 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index d7ba3970e1e9..9725eebe5706 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <drm/drm_fixed.h>
@@ -673,6 +674,7 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
int cdclk = cdclk_config->cdclk;
u32 val, cmd = cdclk_config->voltage_level;
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
+ int ret;
switch (cdclk) {
case 400000:
@@ -703,12 +705,12 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK;
val |= (cmd << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT);
vlv_punit_write(display->drm, PUNIT_REG_DSPSSPM, val);
- if (wait_for((vlv_punit_read(display->drm, PUNIT_REG_DSPSSPM) &
- DSPFREQSTAT_MASK) == (cmd << DSPFREQSTAT_SHIFT),
- 50)) {
- drm_err(display->drm,
- "timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
- }
+
+ ret = poll_timeout_us(val = vlv_punit_read(display->drm, PUNIT_REG_DSPSSPM),
+ (val & DSPFREQSTAT_MASK) == (cmd << DSPFREQSTAT_SHIFT),
+ 500, 50 * 1000, false);
+ if (ret)
+ drm_err(display->drm, "timed out waiting for CDCLK change\n");
if (cdclk == 400000) {
u32 divider;
@@ -722,11 +724,11 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
val |= divider;
vlv_cck_write(display->drm, CCK_DISPLAY_CLOCK_CONTROL, val);
- if (wait_for((vlv_cck_read(display->drm, CCK_DISPLAY_CLOCK_CONTROL) &
- CCK_FREQUENCY_STATUS) == (divider << CCK_FREQUENCY_STATUS_SHIFT),
- 50))
- drm_err(display->drm,
- "timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
+ ret = poll_timeout_us(val = vlv_cck_read(display->drm, CCK_DISPLAY_CLOCK_CONTROL),
+ (val & CCK_FREQUENCY_STATUS) == (divider << CCK_FREQUENCY_STATUS_SHIFT),
+ 500, 50 * 1000, false);
+ if (ret)
+ drm_err(display->drm, "timed out waiting for CDCLK change\n");
}
/* adjust self-refresh exit latency value */
@@ -762,6 +764,7 @@ static void chv_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
int cdclk = cdclk_config->cdclk;
u32 val, cmd = cdclk_config->voltage_level;
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
+ int ret;
switch (cdclk) {
case 333333:
@@ -787,12 +790,12 @@ static void chv_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV;
val |= (cmd << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT_CHV);
vlv_punit_write(display->drm, PUNIT_REG_DSPSSPM, val);
- if (wait_for((vlv_punit_read(display->drm, PUNIT_REG_DSPSSPM) &
- DSPFREQSTAT_MASK_CHV) == (cmd << DSPFREQSTAT_SHIFT_CHV),
- 50)) {
- drm_err(display->drm,
- "timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
- }
+
+ ret = poll_timeout_us(val = vlv_punit_read(display->drm, PUNIT_REG_DSPSSPM),
+ (val & DSPFREQSTAT_MASK_CHV) == (cmd << DSPFREQSTAT_SHIFT_CHV),
+ 500, 50 * 1000, false);
+ if (ret)
+ drm_err(display->drm, "timed out waiting for CDCLK change\n");
vlv_punit_put(display->drm);
--
2.47.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 12:20 [PATCH 00/20] drm/i915/display: convert to generic poll_timeout_us() Jani Nikula
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/20] drm/i915/hdmi: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of __wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-03 13:29 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-09-04 11:26 ` Jani Nikula
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/20] drm/i915/hdcp: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-03 13:42 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/20] drm/i915/hdcp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 4:14 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/20] drm/i915/dsi: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for_us() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 4:27 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/20] drm/i915/dsi-pll: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 4:34 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/20] drm/i915/gmbus: use generic poll_timeout*() instead of wait_for*() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 4:53 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/20] drm/i915/wm: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:01 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-09-04 5:45 ` [PATCH 08/20] drm/i915/cdclk: " Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/20] drm/i915/power: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:47 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/20] drm/i915/power-well: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() for DKL PHY Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:48 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/20] drm/i915/power-well: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() for VLV/CHV Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 5:54 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 12/20] drm/i915/dp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 6:08 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915/dp: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() in link training Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 6:15 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915/vblank: use generic poll_timeout_us() instead of wait_for() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 8:05 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm/i915/tc: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 8:41 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/20] drm/i915/dsb: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 8:42 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/20] drm/i915/lspcon: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 8:47 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:21 ` [PATCH 18/20] drm/i915/opregion: " Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 9:06 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:21 ` [PATCH 19/20] drm/i915/ddi: prefer poll_timeout_us() over readx_poll_timeout() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 9:19 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 12:21 ` [PATCH 20/20] drm/i915/pps: prefer poll_timeout_us() over read_poll_timeout() Jani Nikula
2025-09-04 10:23 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-08-28 17:44 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: convert to generic poll_timeout_us() Patchwork
2025-08-29 0:27 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d50031411d5517508867d4b595ce90a2b44073b.1756383233.git.jani.nikula@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).