intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mun, Gwan-gyeong" <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 10:22:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <71d1567f3988a3d7759f8da9f5dcdf457a80a2a0.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08cdecd9a91e2b71d1adb34ef7c034b7e9518c29.camel@intel.com>

On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 13:15 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 19:40 +0000, Mun, Gwan-gyeong wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 09:39 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 17:26 +0000, Mun, Gwan-gyeong wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 13:12 -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 01:04 +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 21:40 +0000, Mun, Gwan-gyeong wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 16:01 -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the
> > > > > > > > damaged
> > > > > > > > area.
> > > > > > > > Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched
> > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > software
> > > > > > > > needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage
> > > > > > > > clips.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > > > > Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <
> > > > > > > > jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 54
> > > > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > > > > > index 773a5b5fa078..0f1e9f0fa57f 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -1273,6 +1273,9 @@ int
> > > > > > > > intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct
> > > > > > > > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > > > > > > >  	for_each_oldnew_intel_plane_in_state(state,
> > > > > > > > plane,
> > > > > > > > old_plane_state,
> > > > > > > >  					     new_plane_
> > > > > > > > state,
> > > > > > > > i) {
> > > > > > > >  		struct drm_rect *sel_fetch_area, temp;
> > > > > > > > +		struct drm_mode_rect *damaged_clips;
> > > > > > > > +		u32 num_clips;
> > > > > > > > +		int j;
> > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  		if (new_plane_state->uapi.crtc !=
> > > > > > > > crtc_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.crtc)
> > > > > > > >  			continue;
> > > > selective fetch area also can be affected by Selective Updated
> > > > region. 
> > > > therefore Selective Updated region rect should be calculated
> > > > first
> > > > and
> > > > then the plane's selective fetch area should be applied
> > > > (intersected by
> > > > calculated SU.)
> > > > please check this implementation.
> > > 
> > > Why selective update region needs to be calculate first if it
> > > should
> > > be based on the plane damage areas/selective fetch areas?
> > > Can you give a example where it gives not the expected result?
> > > 
> > I drew the example here : 
> > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MI20q_3GublGYsY2TDheRncOQsbIjMn20aQ99loaoFg/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> Thanks so much for the drawing, now I got what you were talking
> about.
> This point is not very clear in BSpec but you are right we need to
> set plane selective fetch area using the whole area damaged in pipe.
> 
> Can you take a look at the last patch in this branch? 
> https://github.com/zehortigoza/linux/tree/psr2-sel-fetch-part3-v4
I commented your WIP patch.
> Will do some testing and squash into the right commits and resend in
> the next couple of the days.
> 
> > > > (
> > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/404264/?series=84340&rev=1
> > > > )
> > > > > > > > @@ -1291,13 +1294,54 @@ int
> > > > > > > > intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct
> > > > > > > > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > > > > > > >  		if (!new_plane_state->uapi.visible)
> > > > > > > >  			continue;
> > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > +		sel_fetch_area = &new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > psr2_sel_fetch_area;
> > > > > > > > +		sel_fetch_area->y1 = -1;
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +		damaged_clips =
> > > > > > > > drm_plane_get_damage_clips(&new_plane_state->uapi);
> > > > > > > > +		num_clips =
> > > > > > > > drm_plane_get_damage_clips_count(&new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > >uapi);
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > >  		/*
> > > > > > > > -		 * For now doing a selective fetch in
> > > > > > > > the whole
> > > > > > > > plane
> > > > > > > > area,
> > > > > > > > -		 * optimizations will come in the
> > > > > > > > future.
> > > > > > > > +		 * If plane moved, mark the whole plane
> > > > > > > > area as
> > > > > > > > damaged
> > > > > > > > as it
> > > > > > > > +		 * needs to be complete redraw in the
> > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > position.
> > > > > > > >  		 */
> > > > > > > > -		sel_fetch_area = &new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > psr2_sel_fetch_area;
> > > > > > > > -		sel_fetch_area->y1 = new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.src.y1 >>
> > > > > > > > 16;
> > > > > > > > -		sel_fetch_area->y2 = new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.src.y2 >>
> > > > > > > > 16;
> > > > > > > > +		if (!drm_rect_equals(&new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.dst,
> > > > > > > > +				     &old_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.dst)) {
> > > > > > > > +			num_clips = 0;
> > > > > > > > +			sel_fetch_area->y1 =
> > > > > > > > new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.src.y1 >> 16;
> > > > > > > > +			sel_fetch_area->y2 =
> > > > > > > > new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.src.y2 >> 16;
> > > > > > > > +		} else if (!num_clips &&
> > > > > > > > new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.fb !=
> > > > > > > > +			   old_plane_state->uapi.fb) {
> > > > > > > > +			/*
> > > > > > > > +			 * If the plane don't have
> > > > > > > > damage areas
> > > > > > > > but the
> > > > > > > > +			 * framebuffer changed, mark
> > > > > > > > the whole
> > > > > > > > plane
> > > > > > > > area as
> > > > > > > > +			 * damaged.
> > > > > > > > +			 */
> > > > > > > > +			sel_fetch_area->y1 =
> > > > > > > > new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.src.y1 >> 16;
> > > > > > > > +			sel_fetch_area->y2 =
> > > > > > > > new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.src.y2 >> 16;
> > > > > > > > +		}
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > why don't you use drm_atomic_helper_damage_merged()
> > > > > > > function
> > > > > > > here?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > hum did not knew about this function, will take a look at
> > > > > > as it
> > > > > > does more than just merge all damaged areas.
> > > > > 
> > > > > We can't use this function as it marks the whole plane area
> > > > > as
> > > > > damaged if there is no damaged clips.
> > > > > But for our use case this is bad as we add all planes of the
> > > > > pipe/CRTC to the state, so it would cause a full fetch of the
> > > > > planes
> > > > > without any
> > > > > flip/modification.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > > +		for (j = 0; j < num_clips; j++) {
> > > > > > > > +			struct drm_rect damage_area;
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +			damage_area.y1 =
> > > > > > > > damaged_clips[j].y1;
> > > > > > > > +			damage_area.y2 =
> > > > > > > > damaged_clips[j].y2;
> > > > > > > > +			clip_area_update(sel_fetch_area
> > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > &damage_area);
> > > > > > > > +		}
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +		/*
> > > > > > > > +		 * No page flip, no plane moviment or
> > > > > > > > no damage
> > > > > > > > areas,
> > > > > > > > so don't
> > > > > > > typo (moviment -> movement)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > fixed
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > +		 * fetch any pixel from memory for this
> > > > > > > > plane
> > > > > > > > +		 */
> > > > > > > > +		if (sel_fetch_area->y1 == -1) {
> > > > > > > > +			sel_fetch_area->y1 = 0;
> > > > > > > > +			sel_fetch_area->y2 = 0;
> > > > > > > > +		}
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +		/* Don't need to redraw plane damaged
> > > > > > > > areas
> > > > > > > > outside of
> > > > > > > > screen */
> > > > > > > > +		j = sel_fetch_area->y2 +
> > > > > > > > (new_plane_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.dst.y1
> > > > > > > > > > 16);
> > > > > > > src coordinates of the drm_plane_state are 16.16 fixed
> > > > > > > point
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > dst
> > > > > > > coordinates are not 16.16 fixed point.
> > > > > > > therefore we don't need to bit shift for dst.
> > > > > > > Because the sel_fetch_area seems based on src
> > > > > > > coordinates, in
> > > > > > > order to
> > > > > > > apply to dst coordinates here,  it requires coordinate
> > > > > > > calculation. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > thanks for catching this, also fixed the same issue patch
> > > > > > 1.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > +		j = crtc_state-
> > > > > > > > > uapi.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay - j;
> > > > > > > > +		if (j < 0)
> > > > > > > > +			sel_fetch_area->y2 += j;
> > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  		temp = *sel_fetch_area;
> > > > > > > >  		temp.y1 += new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y1 
> > > > > > > > >> 16;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-13 23:01 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/display/psr: Calculate selective fetch plane registers José Roberto de Souza
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area José Roberto de Souza
2020-10-26 21:40   ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2020-10-27  1:04     ` Souza, Jose
2020-10-27 20:12       ` Souza, Jose
2020-12-01 17:26         ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2020-12-01 17:39           ` Souza, Jose
2020-12-01 19:40             ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2020-12-01 21:15               ` Souza, Jose
2020-12-02 10:22                 ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong [this message]
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/display/psr: Consider other planes to damaged area calculation José Roberto de Souza
2020-10-27 13:34   ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2020-10-27 17:25     ` Souza, Jose
2020-12-01 17:33       ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2020-12-01 17:44         ` Souza, Jose
2020-12-01 19:44           ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/display: Split and export main surface calculation from skl_check_main_surface() José Roberto de Souza
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] RFC/WIP: drm/i915/display/psr: Consider tiling when doing the plane offset calculation José Roberto de Souza
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] DEBUG: drm/i915/display: Add debug information to selective fetch José Roberto de Souza
2020-10-13 23:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915/display/psr: Calculate selective fetch plane registers Patchwork
2020-10-13 23:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-10-13 23:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-14 15:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-26 21:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] " Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2020-10-27  0:24   ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=71d1567f3988a3d7759f8da9f5dcdf457a80a2a0.camel@intel.com \
    --to=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).