From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Add backend level request in and out tracepoints
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:59:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e510d6e-a0ca-63c4-5c30-e8680f838dea@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170127122714.GN19521@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 27/01/2017 12:27, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:01:26PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> Two new tracepoints placed at the call sites where requests are
>> actually passed to the GPU enable userspace to track engine
>> utilisation.
>>
>> These tracepoints are only enabled when the
>> DRM_I915_LOW_LEVEL_TRACEPOINTS Kconfig option is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 4 +++
>> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> index 8ced9e26f075..beec88a30347 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> @@ -518,6 +518,8 @@ static void __i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>> if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(rq->ring->vma))
>> POSTING_READ_FW(GUC_STATUS);
>>
>> + trace_i915_gem_request_in(rq, 0);
>
> But how to get out for guc? We could do a similar in for ringbuffer.
> The original way I used it was in == dispatch, out == ring-notify, which
> is why trace_i915_gem_ring_dispatch enabled the signaling.
That was my thinking as well.
> Hmm. Following on from that we can add the out tracepoint as a
> fence-callback. For the moment, I'd drop guc/legacy
> trace_i915_gem_request_in and we will try something more magical. Though
> once we do enable the fake GuC scheduler we will have an appropriate
> place to drop an trace_i915_gem_request_out. Just leaving ringbuffer as
> the odd one out, but for who arguably the in/out logic is not as
> important.
Fence signalled is very lazy if no one is listening, no? So until the
GUC backend I thought request_in and deriving the _out from _notify in
userspace would be OK. Meaning enable signalling stays until then.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-27 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-27 12:01 [RFC 0/8] Tracepoints cleanup and improvements for requests Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:01 ` [RFC 1/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Tidy request event class Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:01 ` [RFC 2/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Adjust i915_gem_ring_dispatch Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:37 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-30 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:01 ` [RFC 3/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Tidy i915_gem_request_wait_begin Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:14 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-30 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:01 ` [RFC 4/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Remove unused i915_gem_request_complete Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:46 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-27 12:01 ` [RFC 5/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Add request submit and execute tracepoints Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:01 ` [RFC 6/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Rename i915_gem_request_notify Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:20 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-27 13:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-30 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-30 19:44 ` Chris Wilson
2017-02-20 15:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-02-20 16:07 ` Chris Wilson
2017-02-20 17:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:01 ` [RFC 7/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Add backend level request in and out tracepoints Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:27 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-27 13:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2017-01-27 14:07 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-27 14:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 14:29 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-30 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 12:01 ` [RFC 8/8] drm/i915/tracepoints: Add hw_id to context tracepoints Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-01-27 13:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Tracepoints cleanup and improvements for requests Patchwork
2017-01-30 23:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Tracepoints cleanup and improvements for requests (rev5) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e510d6e-a0ca-63c4-5c30-e8680f838dea@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox