From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: drm-intel-next forced update? Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:19:11 +0000 Message-ID: <849307$afgs1s@azsmga001.ch.intel.com> References: <1290446001.9163.0.camel@pcjc2lap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9CCA0ECE for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:19:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1290446001.9163.0.camel@pcjc2lap> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Peter Clifton , Intel List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:13:21 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > Was this intentional? > > + a17577c...5f75377 drm-intel-next -> drm-intel/drm-intel-next (forced update) Yes. 2 patches were moved to -fixes and I had left -next in an inconsistent state last week (especially as I thought some major surgery was about to be involved). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre