From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] xf86-video-intel: Update autotools configuration Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:47:34 +0100 Message-ID: <849307$c9k6e3@azsmga001.ch.intel.com> References: <20110210110248.GJ9787@debian.org> <20110330014329.GA31787@debian.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1596134507==" Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003689E75F for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 02:47:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110330014329.GA31787@debian.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Cyril Brulebois Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1596134507== Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 03:43:29 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi again, > > Cyril Brulebois (10/02/2011): > > The commit message says: > > | Update autotools configuration > > | > > | Use new libtool syntax and silent-rules to silent > > | the build output a bit (linux-like) > > > > What it doesn't say is: > > -AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(.) > > +AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux]) > > sorry to get back to this, but it's actually a bit more annoying than > just breaking tinderbox at the time. Out of the 56 X drivers I'm > currently maintaining, that's the only one no longer searching in '.', > and I don't know why that should be. > > Also, “autoreconf -vfi” puts files there, but those aren't cleaned, > even through targets like distclean or maintainer-clean. Having to > clean things through “git clean -xdf” sounds like a no-no to me. (Of > course, our build system is flexible enough that I can do anything, > like rm -rf'ing that directory, but I'd rather not have to come to > this kind of things…) I am slightly perplexed by this, since the darn thing passed make distcheck which I thought included a test to make sure that all files were deleted after a make clean. Was I just naive in believing that was sufficient? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre --===============1596134507== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx --===============1596134507==--