From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7892C5478C for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B2E112057; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hSR3nXiZ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4BBF112057 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:51:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709553081; x=1741089081; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=fulqvDi7620hVs2RBb1+tkktIScAtd772mrcoPK/dF0=; b=hSR3nXiZmxRKDzWl64JexMqcCyjIg4jNb+NhlyOgYNkp/5viyJkSmbmz JXdek5ifDjYGrYSJnPQ8Y0ZsS7TVuK99TiybvHLVKnl5XDIQmbllkE57m pJBDLEhf23oFOhomka9dCHqdeaC9Detp6e9dZodRGJVdsDPzYXjUyNM/0 nT0VeNTj/XtnnDtz3QwhnDLi7h4TVzQzQ42K8Fc88WP91qTkL+VSRwFsg RXYeEM58NsNU77yT7v5s/zCh4PaTi9E1Cd33gz188XX9ZDiQX/PeSdkgT 0W+rIHSG3Z0+MNth4Nuv6DapQwlomiBJsj0Nlt3VR6L9SWBEmXYHJc+b8 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11002"; a="7848485" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,203,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="7848485" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2024 03:51:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,203,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="32132346" Received: from syakovle-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.51.3]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2024 03:51:17 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: "Chauhan, Shekhar" , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com, clinton.a.taylor@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/dp: Increase idle pattern wait timeout to 2ms In-Reply-To: <38af1ac9-d40f-42e8-9bc4-fb4095b06923@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20240304050631.774920-1-shekhar.chauhan@intel.com> <87il225qpo.fsf@intel.com> <38af1ac9-d40f-42e8-9bc4-fb4095b06923@intel.com> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:51:06 +0200 Message-ID: <871q8q5i6t.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, "Chauhan, Shekhar" wrote: > On 3/4/2024 14:16, Jani Nikula wrote: >> I did not ask for this. I would rather all platforms used 2 ms. I even >> said the original change looked fine. But I'd like it to be explained in >> the commit message. > I felt that when you said "why bump for non lnl platforms", I felt that > I should be segregating them. > But, as discussed offline, I'll revert back to the original design with > a change in the commit message. Thanks. Communication is hard. :) BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel