From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [CI] drm/i915: Refactor unsettting obj->mm.pages
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:35:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sdd4i2g.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180611075532.26534-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> As i915_gem_object_phys_attach() wants to play dirty and mess around
> with obj->mm.pages itself (replacing the shmemfs with a DMA allocation),
> refactor the gubbins so into i915_gem_object_unset_pages() that we don't
> have to duplicate all the secrets.
Triple t in "unsettting" in the subject. Can be fixed while applying.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 4187e0688e50..026a27afa65c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2401,29 +2401,15 @@ static void __i915_gem_object_reset_page_iter(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> -void __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> - enum i915_mm_subclass subclass)
> +static struct sg_table *
> +__i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
> struct sg_table *pages;
>
> - if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
> - return;
> -
> - GEM_BUG_ON(obj->bind_count);
> - if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj))
> - return;
> -
> - /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
> - mutex_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, subclass);
> - if (unlikely(atomic_read(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count)))
> - goto unlock;
> -
> - /* ->put_pages might need to allocate memory for the bit17 swizzle
> - * array, hence protect them from being reaped by removing them from gtt
> - * lists early. */
> pages = fetch_and_zero(&obj->mm.pages);
> - GEM_BUG_ON(!pages);
> + if (!pages)
> + return NULL;
>
> spin_lock(&i915->mm.obj_lock);
> list_del(&obj->mm.link);
> @@ -2442,12 +2428,37 @@ void __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> }
>
> __i915_gem_object_reset_page_iter(obj);
> + obj->mm.page_sizes.phys = obj->mm.page_sizes.sg = 0;
> +
> + return pages;
> +}
>
> +void __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> + enum i915_mm_subclass subclass)
> +{
> + struct sg_table *pages;
> +
> + if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
> + return;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(obj->bind_count);
> + if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj))
> + return;
> +
> + /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
> + mutex_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, subclass);
> + if (unlikely(atomic_read(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count)))
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + /*
> + * ->put_pages might need to allocate memory for the bit17 swizzle
> + * array, hence protect them from being reaped by removing them from gtt
> + * lists early.
> + */
> + pages = __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(obj);
> if (!IS_ERR(pages))
> obj->ops->put_pages(obj, pages);
>
> - obj->mm.page_sizes.phys = obj->mm.page_sizes.sg = 0;
> -
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&obj->mm.lock);
> }
> @@ -6090,16 +6101,7 @@ int i915_gem_object_attach_phys(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int align)
> goto err_unlock;
> }
>
> - pages = fetch_and_zero(&obj->mm.pages);
> - if (pages) {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
> -
> - __i915_gem_object_reset_page_iter(obj);
> -
> - spin_lock(&i915->mm.obj_lock);
> - list_del(&obj->mm.link);
> - spin_unlock(&i915->mm.obj_lock);
> - }
> + pages = __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(obj);
>
> obj->ops = &i915_gem_phys_ops;
>
> @@ -6117,7 +6119,11 @@ int i915_gem_object_attach_phys(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int align)
>
> err_xfer:
> obj->ops = &i915_gem_object_ops;
> - obj->mm.pages = pages;
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages)) {
> + unsigned int sg_page_sizes = i915_sg_page_sizes(pages->sgl);
> +
> + __i915_gem_object_set_pages(obj, pages, sg_page_sizes);
> + }
> err_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&obj->mm.lock);
> return err;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-11 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-11 7:55 [CI] drm/i915: Refactor unsettting obj->mm.pages Chris Wilson
2018-06-11 9:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-06-11 9:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-06-11 11:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-06-11 12:35 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871sdd4i2g.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).