intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915: Consult VBT "LVDS config" bits to determine whether internal LVDS is present
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 17:22:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sem5isu.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180508140835.20222-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 08 May 2018, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> VBT seems to have some bits to tell us whether the internal LVDS port
> has something hooked up. In theory one might expect the VBT to not have
> a child device for the LVDS port if there's no panel hooked up, but
> in practice many VBTs still add the child device. The "LVDS config" bits
> seem more reliable though, so let's check those.
>
> So far we've used the "LVDS config" bits to check for eDP support on
> ILK+, and disable the internal LVDS when the value is 3. That value
> is actually documented as "Both internal LVDS and SDVO LVDS", but in
> practice it looks to mean "eDP" on all the ilk+ VBTs I've seen. So let's
> keep that interpretation, but for pre-ILK we will consider the value
> 3 to also indicate the presence of the internal LVDS.
>
> Currently we have 25 DMI matches for the "no internal LVDS" quirk. In an
> effort to reduce that let's toss in a WARN when the DMI match and VBT
> both tell us that the internal LVDS is not present. The hope is that
> people will report a bug, and then we can just nuke the corresponding
> entry from the DMI quirk list. Credits to Jani for this idea.
>
> v2: Split the basic int_lvds_support thing to a separate patch (Jani)
> v3: Rebase
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105468
> References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158408.html
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c     | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c     |  5 ++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index 62cc9d3e20f5..f3545b5aabbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -518,9 +518,19 @@ parse_driver_features(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	if (!driver)
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 5 &&
> -	    driver->lvds_config == BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_EDP)
> -		dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support = 0;
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 5) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Note that we consider BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_INT_SDVO_LVDS
> +		 * to mean "eDP". The VBT spec doesn't agree with that
> +		 * interpretation, but real world VBTs seem to.
> +		 */
> +		if (driver->lvds_config != BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_INT_LVDS)
> +			dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		if (driver->lvds_config != BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_INT_LVDS &&
> +		    driver->lvds_config != BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_INT_SDVO_LVDS)
> +			dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support = 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS State Enabled:%d\n", driver->drrs_enabled);
>  	/*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> index 05d012358df8..5e5a77927369 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> @@ -962,8 +962,11 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* Skip init on machines we know falsely report LVDS */
> -	if (dmi_check_system(intel_no_lvds))
> +	if (dmi_check_system(intel_no_lvds)) {
> +		WARN(!dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support,
> +		     "Useless DMI match. Internal LVDS support disabled by VBT\n");
>  		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (!dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Internal LVDS support disabled by VBT\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h
> index 458468237b5f..39c804624179 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ struct bdb_sdvo_lvds_options {
>  #define BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_NO_LVDS		0
>  #define BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_INT_LVDS		1
>  #define BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_SDVO_LVDS		2
> -#define BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_EDP			3
> +#define BDB_DRIVER_FEATURE_INT_SDVO_LVDS	3
>  
>  struct bdb_driver_features {
>  	u8 boot_dev_algorithm:1;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-08 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-08 12:41 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Replace vbt edp.support with int_lvds_support Ville Syrjala
2018-05-08 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915: Consult VBT "LVDS config" bits to determine whether internal LVDS is present Ville Syrjala
2018-05-08 14:08   ` [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2018-05-08 14:22     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-05-16 14:34     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-05-18 15:01   ` [PATCH v4 1/1] " Ville Syrjala
2018-05-25 15:02     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-05-08 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915: Eliminate the unused dev_priv->vbt.lvds_vbt Ville Syrjala
2018-05-08 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Replace vbt edp.support with int_lvds_support Jani Nikula
2018-05-08 13:41   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-05-08 14:08 ` Ville Syrjala
2018-05-08 14:18   ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-08 16:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915: Replace vbt edp.support with int_lvds_support (rev3) Patchwork
2018-05-08 16:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-08 16:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-08 19:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-05-08 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Replace vbt edp.support with int_lvds_support kbuild test robot
2018-05-08 22:39 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871sem5isu.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).