public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: Only disable execlist preemption for the duration of the request
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:33:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871svuarcf.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170123122420.GZ17136@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:14:25PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> @@ -558,7 +558,8 @@ static bool execlists_elsp_ready(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>  	int port;
>>  
>>  	port = 1; /* wait for a free slot */
>> -	if (engine->disable_lite_restore_wa || engine->preempt_wa)
>> +	if (engine->disable_lite_restore_wa ||
>> +	    engine->execlist_port[0].count > 1)
>>  		port = 0; /* wait for GPU to be idle before continuing */
>
> The disable_lite_restore_wa is a preproduction wa, right? Do we still
> want to keep it?
>

I was about to suggest to getting rid of it. I remeber doing it
but patches are lost somewhere.

The concern with the preempt_wa change is that does it work? =)

-Mika

> If not this could be rewritten as
>
> return port[0].count + port[1].count < 2;
> -Chris
>
> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-23 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-23 12:14 [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: Only disable execlist preemption for the duration of the request Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 12:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: Only run execlist context-switch handler after an interrupt Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 13:30   ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 15:13   ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-01-23 12:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Skip the execlists CSB scan and rewrite if the ring is untouched Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 12:25   ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 12:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Dequeue execlists on a new request if any port is available Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 12:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: Emit dma-fence (and execlists submit) first from signaler Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: Only disable execlist preemption for the duration of the request Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 12:33   ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2017-01-23 12:36     ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-23 13:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/5] " Patchwork
2017-01-23 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] " Mika Kuoppala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871svuarcf.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox