intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ville.syrjala@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add MIPI_IO WA and program DSI regulators
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:04:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871svz9upy.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484822720-8379-1-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com>

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>
> Enable MIPI IO WA for BXT DSI as per bspec and
> program the DSI regulators.
>
> v2: Moved IO enable to pre-enable as per Mika's
> review comments. Also reused the existing register
> definition for BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON.
>
> v3: Added Programming the DSI regulators as per disable/enable
> sequences.
>
> v4: Restricting regulator changes to BXT as suggested by
> Jani/Mika

This applies to BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON changes as well.

One other question inline.

>
> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  7 +++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 00970aa..0a9ad44 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1553,6 +1553,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>  	_MMIO(_BXT_PHY_CH(phy, ch, reg_ch0, reg_ch1))
>  
>  #define BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON		_MMIO(0x138090)
> +#define  MIPIO_RST_CTRL				(1 << 2)
>  
>  #define _BXT_PHY_CTL_DDI_A		0x64C00
>  #define _BXT_PHY_CTL_DDI_B		0x64C10
> @@ -8301,6 +8302,12 @@ enum {
>  #define _BXT_MIPIC_PORT_CTRL				0x6B8C0
>  #define BXT_MIPI_PORT_CTRL(tc)	_MMIO_MIPI(tc, _BXT_MIPIA_PORT_CTRL, _BXT_MIPIC_PORT_CTRL)
>  
> +#define BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG			_MMIO(0x160020)
> +#define  STAP_SELECT					(1 << 0)
> +
> +#define BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL		_MMIO(0x160054)
> +#define  HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT				(1 << 0)
> +
>  #define  DPI_ENABLE					(1 << 31) /* A + C */
>  #define  MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_SHIFT		27
>  #define  MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_MASK		(0xf << 27)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 16732e7..4dc1293 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -548,6 +548,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>  	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
>  	enum port port;
> +	u32 val;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>  
> @@ -558,6 +559,11 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	intel_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>  	intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder, pipe_config);
>  
> +	/* Add MIPI IO reset programming for modeset */
> +	val = I915_READ(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON);
> +	I915_WRITE(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON,
> +				val | MIPIO_RST_CTRL);
> +
>  	intel_dsi_prepare(encoder, pipe_config);
>  
>  	/* Panel Enable over CRC PMIC */
> @@ -575,6 +581,14 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		I915_WRITE(DSPCLK_GATE_D, val);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Power up DSI regulator */
> +	if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> +		I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG, STAP_SELECT);
> +		val = I915_READ(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL);
> +		val &= ~HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT;
> +		I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL, val);

Why does this specific change warrant a read-modify-write when the other
regulator changes in this patch do a full register write?

Also, the enable and disable sequences seem a bit asymmetric with these
changes, i.e. you enable and disable things in different steps of the
sequences. That's a bit surprising.

(These might have an answer in bspec, but I don't seem to be able to
access that right now.)


BR,
Jani.

> +	}
> +
>  	/* put device in ready state */
>  	intel_dsi_device_ready(encoder);
>  
> @@ -707,6 +721,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>  	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +	u32 val;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>  
> @@ -714,8 +729,18 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>  	intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder);
>  
> +	val = I915_READ(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON);
> +	I915_WRITE(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON,
> +				val & ~MIPIO_RST_CTRL);
> +
>  	intel_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>  
> +	if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> +		/* Power down DSI regulator to save power */
> +		I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG, STAP_SELECT);
> +		I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL, HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>  		u32 val;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-19 10:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add MIPI_IO WA and program DSI regulators Vidya Srinivas
2017-01-19 11:04 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-01-25 13:48   ` Shankar, Uma
2017-01-25 14:13     ` Vidya Srinivas
2017-01-31 10:10       ` Srinivas, Vidya
2017-01-31 10:57       ` Mika Kahola
2017-02-01 14:49         ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-19 12:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2017-01-25 14:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Add MIPI_IO WA and program DSI regulators (rev2) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-18 10:16 [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Add MIPI_IO WA Imre Deak
2017-01-19  6:11 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Add MIPI_IO WA and program DSI regulators Vidya Srinivas
2017-01-19  8:42   ` Mika Kahola
2017-01-19  9:28     ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871svz9upy.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).