From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/crt: make intel_crt_reset() static again
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:21:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736x7tgfh.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628064509.GL13978@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:49:40PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:03:30PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> Commit 9504a8924759 ("drm/i915/vlv: Reset the ADPA in
>> >> vlv_display_power_well_init()") started calling intel_crt_reset()
>> >> directly, while we could just as well use the hooks and keep the
>> >> function static.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
>> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 2 +-
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 -
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 2 +-
>> >> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
>> >> index 0c6bf82bb059..c2cb3b7a255b 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
>> >> @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int intel_crt_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> >> return ret;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -void intel_crt_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>> >> +static void intel_crt_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>> >> {
>> >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->dev);
>> >> struct intel_crt *crt = intel_encoder_to_crt(to_intel_encoder(encoder));
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> >> index 0c3ac0eafde0..b2002fee1b58 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> >> @@ -1373,7 +1373,6 @@ void gen9_disable_guc_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> >> bool intel_crt_port_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >> i915_reg_t adpa_reg, enum pipe *pipe);
>> >> void intel_crt_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> >> -void intel_crt_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
>> >>
>> >> /* intel_ddi.c */
>> >> void intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> >> index de3a81034f77..0b3da5818383 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> >> @@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ static void vlv_display_power_well_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> >> /* Re-enable the ADPA, if we have one */
>> >> for_each_intel_encoder(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
>> >> if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_ANALOG)
>> >> - intel_crt_reset(&encoder->base);
>> >> + encoder->base.funcs->reset(&encoder->base);
>> >
>> > I have a feeling I requested the direct call to make it less annoying to
>> > figure out what it's actually calling. But if people prefer the function
>> > pointer version I can live with that too.
>>
>> True that, but I thought the direct call was a layering violation.
>>
>> To push, or not to push, that is the question.
>
> Lemma pile my bikeshed on top: Given that we specifically filter for the
> CRT encoder I think a direct call is better here, since a bit more clear
> what's going on. hw occasionally encouragse layering violations ...
Okay, I'll drop the patch for now.
BR,
Jani.
> -Daniel
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> i915_redisable_vga_power_on(dev_priv);
>> >> --
>> >> 2.11.0
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 13:03 [PATCH] drm/i915/crt: make intel_crt_reset() static again Jani Nikula
2018-06-21 13:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2018-06-21 14:00 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-06-27 11:49 ` Jani Nikula
2018-06-28 6:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-06-28 9:21 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-06-25 7:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-06-25 11:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8736x7tgfh.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=cpaul@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).