Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Revert ea0000f0 "Roll out the helper nonblock tracking"

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>]

On Sun, 27 Nov 2016, Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu> wrote:
> Commit ea0000f0 has been causing multiple problems for i915 users. See for
> example:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96781
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97529
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385228
> https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/520969-drm-915-Resetting-chip-after-gpu-hang
>
> Those last two are not confirmed but look like the same problem.
>
> This has only been lightly tested and probably shouldn't go upstream yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>

Daniel, any comments on this one?

BR,
Jani.


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 ----------
>  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 81c1149..c31c9e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -14346,8 +14346,6 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  		WARN_ON(ret);
>  	}
>  
> -	drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_dependencies(state);
> -
>  	if (intel_state->modeset) {
>  		memcpy(dev_priv->min_pixclk, intel_state->min_pixclk,
>  		       sizeof(intel_state->min_pixclk));
> @@ -14470,8 +14468,6 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  	if (intel_state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
>  		intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
>  
> -	drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(state);
> -
>  	if (intel_state->modeset)
>  		intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET);
>  
> @@ -14479,8 +14475,6 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  	drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes(dev, state);
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  
> -	drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done(state);
> -
>  	drm_atomic_state_free(state);
>  
>  	/* As one of the primary mmio accessors, KMS has a high likelihood
> @@ -14546,10 +14540,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit(state, nonblock);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
>  	INIT_WORK(&state->commit_work, intel_atomic_commit_work);
>  
>  	ret = intel_atomic_prepare_commit(dev, state, nonblock);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx