From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: consider the source max DP lane count too Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:16:32 +0300 Message-ID: <8738h1x4j3.fsf@intel.com> References: <1398374579-5697-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FFA6E14F for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:16:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1398374579-5697-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Paulo Zanoni , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Paulo Zanoni List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > Even if the panel claims it can support 4 lanes, there's the > possibility that the HW can't, so consider this while selecting the > max lane count. > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index 104998e..19537a6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -120,6 +120,22 @@ intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > return max_link_bw; > } > > +static u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > +{ > + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); > + struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev; > + u8 source_max, sink_max; > + > + source_max = 4; > + if (HAS_DDI(dev) && intel_dig_port->port == PORT_A && > + (intel_dig_port->saved_port_bits & DDI_A_4_LANES) == 0) > + source_max = 2; Wow, good catch. Are you aware of similar restrictions on other platforms? Does this potentially fix https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73539 ? BR, Jani. > + > + sink_max = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd); > + > + return min(source_max, sink_max); > +} > + > /* > * The units on the numbers in the next two are... bizarre. Examples will > * make it clearer; this one parallels an example in the eDP spec. > @@ -170,7 +186,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, > } > > max_link_clock = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp)); > - max_lanes = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd); > + max_lanes = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp); > > max_rate = intel_dp_max_data_rate(max_link_clock, max_lanes); > mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(target_clock, 18); > @@ -764,7 +780,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = encoder->new_crtc; > struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector; > int lane_count, clock; > - int max_lane_count = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd); > + int max_lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp); > /* Conveniently, the link BW constants become indices with a shift...*/ > int max_clock = intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp) >> 3; > int bpp, mode_rate; > -- > 1.9.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center