From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F201C52D7C for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E82E10EA9F; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="EmIqVpaD"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4100610EA9F; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:29:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724333362; x=1755869362; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=nyvWwnTZmSrvyaUML7BPVBg9HDTpDm657deav8q6a10=; b=EmIqVpaD9gMXKqc+BL8R+EXIx+/HYEy0HR6DV8XQGZiGOGNuXSGqHgqi imSrK4DwcGy5DmQtXZTNxCUFmZiiewVvP5lUd57RTIR0gL4kCNqOE1JJh 3FfMAIYauV2dIk2amzn3U/s7qTAxFzDbtHICUyGQpl32wMnHZZB7U9mJM wP9ZJr8XteAgNgZvOLqCD7dUKW0vP+DpxAK137syrCk8NrHtFzYVxwPVA vATx9VRG3bY7lIIU2ogfT6bMZhu3NwzHSj4UhiqVaDZt0PRSCi4IEM3bF ZM1nvPhMWA42zJFVaQfL6hVnZT5eT8eGS1lSujiYCSA4FqGR5MZYraZGo w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3UyYATbhTiSUXRkHBrKk/g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oPAEmBWNTfirAuHFnIoo/w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11172"; a="33899465" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,167,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="33899465" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2024 06:29:10 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Nju5Hio8SUeViCNCOZzfKw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: W6FtVkFkQuu2p4Vrol+5MA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,167,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="98961077" Received: from cpetruta-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.121]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2024 06:29:09 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Lucas De Marchi Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, matthew.d.roper@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915/display: identify display steppings in display code In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <87cym04yot.fsf@intel.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:29:03 +0300 Message-ID: <874j7c4rfk.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Thu, 22 Aug 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 01:52:18PM GMT, Jani Nikula wrote: >>On Tue, 20 Aug 2024, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> Use a Single Point of Truth for display stepping detection instead of >>> duplicating in i915 and xe. >> >>Lucas, Rodrigo, ack for merging this via drm-intel-next? > > > Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi Thanks for the reviews and acks, pushed to din. I did some (but not exhaustive) cross-checking between drm-tip and patchwork CI results, and didn't spot any differences in dmesg on the steppings. I also posted a slightly modified series to trybot, with a patch [1] to warn on any differences between steppings before and after the changes, all good AFAICT. BR, Jani. [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240821100058.2055981-10-jani.nikula@intel.com -- Jani Nikula, Intel