From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: "Vetter, Daniel" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:03:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874m3ffy8g.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161109173825.GL6536@intel.com>
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:27:37AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:21:22PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> >> One of the memsets was added by 5a920b85f2c6 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB
>> >> partitioning for multi-screen cases"), and the other was added by
>> >> 01c72d6c17 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen
>> >> cases"). I'm confused and I'll let the maintainers find out what went
>> >> wrong here.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>> >
>> > I think this is just an artifact of having the patch in both -next and
>> > -fixes. The context probably changed later in -next causing a conflict
>> > when the two were merged, and then the merge resolution accidentally
>> > duplicated this hunk. The merge commit ac4139ed7 is where we wound up
>> > with the two copies:
>>
>> I don't have that merge commit. Is that a nightly rebuild?
>
> Yeah, it's part of a nightly rebuild. Looks like
> 82282577545 is the equivalent now.
>
>> I don't think we even have this issue in anywhere other than
>> nightly. There isn't a branch we could apply this fix to.
>
> Yeah, the patch can't apply anywhere directly, but I thought we could
> make rerere forget its resolution of intel_pm.c for that merge and then
> fix it by hand so that future merges behave correctly?
Only if it was a manual fixup that went wrong. For silent conflicts, we
need to add a fixup patch for the merge.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > index db24f89,cc9e0c0..88e28c9
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > @@@ -3361,11 -3404,13 +3404,17 @@@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc
>> > unsigned int total_data_rate;
>> > int num_active;
>> > int id, i;
>> > + unsigned plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> > + unsigned plane_y_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> > +
>> > + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> > + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> > + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >
>> > + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> > + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> > + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> > +
>> > if (WARN_ON(!state))
>> > return 0;
>> >
>> > Dropping one looks good to me.
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> >
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ----
>> >> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> index 88e28c9..cc9e0c0 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> @@ -3411,10 +3411,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>> >> memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> >> memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >>
>> >> - /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> >> - memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> >> - memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >> -
>> >> if (WARN_ON(!state))
>> >> return 0;
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> 2.7.4
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> >> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 17:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() Paulo Zanoni
2016-11-08 18:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-09 1:13 ` [PATCH] " Matt Roper
2016-11-09 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2016-11-09 17:38 ` Matt Roper
2016-11-10 10:03 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874m3ffy8g.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).