* [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
@ 2016-11-08 17:21 Paulo Zanoni
2016-11-08 18:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-09 1:13 ` [PATCH] " Matt Roper
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2016-11-08 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Jani Nikula, Paulo Zanoni
One of the memsets was added by 5a920b85f2c6 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB
partitioning for multi-screen cases"), and the other was added by
01c72d6c17 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen
cases"). I'm confused and I'll let the maintainers find out what went
wrong here.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 88e28c9..cc9e0c0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3411,10 +3411,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
- /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
- memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
- memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
-
if (WARN_ON(!state))
return 0;
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
2016-11-08 17:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() Paulo Zanoni
@ 2016-11-08 18:15 ` Patchwork
2016-11-09 1:13 ` [PATCH] " Matt Roper
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-11-08 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Zanoni; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/14984/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 14984v1 drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/14984/revisions/1/mbox/
Test drv_module_reload_basic:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-skl-6770hq)
fi-bdw-5557u total:244 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
fi-bsw-n3050 total:244 pass:204 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40
fi-bxt-t5700 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
fi-byt-j1900 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
fi-byt-n2820 total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
fi-hsw-4770 total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-hsw-4770r total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-ilk-650 total:244 pass:191 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53
fi-ivb-3520m total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-ivb-3770 total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-kbl-7200u total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-skl-6260u total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-skl-6700hq total:244 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6700k total:244 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6770hq total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-snb-2520m total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
fi-snb-2600 total:244 pass:211 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
9435ffb9ffbfecfa5a429a46af96b1b3fda41d6c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-11m-08d-13h-53m-48s UTC integration manifest
af272ef drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_2936/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
2016-11-08 17:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() Paulo Zanoni
2016-11-08 18:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2016-11-09 1:13 ` Matt Roper
2016-11-09 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matt Roper @ 2016-11-09 1:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Zanoni; +Cc: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:21:22PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> One of the memsets was added by 5a920b85f2c6 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB
> partitioning for multi-screen cases"), and the other was added by
> 01c72d6c17 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen
> cases"). I'm confused and I'll let the maintainers find out what went
> wrong here.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
I think this is just an artifact of having the patch in both -next and
-fixes. The context probably changed later in -next causing a conflict
when the two were merged, and then the merge resolution accidentally
duplicated this hunk. The merge commit ac4139ed7 is where we wound up
with the two copies:
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index db24f89,cc9e0c0..88e28c9
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@@ -3361,11 -3404,13 +3404,17 @@@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc
unsigned int total_data_rate;
int num_active;
int id, i;
+ unsigned plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
+ unsigned plane_y_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
+
+ /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
+ memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
+ memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
+ /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
+ memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
+ memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
+
if (WARN_ON(!state))
return 0;
Dropping one looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 88e28c9..cc9e0c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3411,10 +3411,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
> memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>
> - /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
> - memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
> - memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
> -
> if (WARN_ON(!state))
> return 0;
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
2016-11-09 1:13 ` [PATCH] " Matt Roper
@ 2016-11-09 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2016-11-09 17:38 ` Matt Roper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2016-11-09 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Roper, Paulo Zanoni; +Cc: Vetter, Daniel, intel-gfx
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:21:22PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> One of the memsets was added by 5a920b85f2c6 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB
>> partitioning for multi-screen cases"), and the other was added by
>> 01c72d6c17 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen
>> cases"). I'm confused and I'll let the maintainers find out what went
>> wrong here.
>>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> I think this is just an artifact of having the patch in both -next and
> -fixes. The context probably changed later in -next causing a conflict
> when the two were merged, and then the merge resolution accidentally
> duplicated this hunk. The merge commit ac4139ed7 is where we wound up
> with the two copies:
I don't have that merge commit. Is that a nightly rebuild?
I don't think we even have this issue in anywhere other than
nightly. There isn't a branch we could apply this fix to.
BR,
Jani.
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index db24f89,cc9e0c0..88e28c9
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@@ -3361,11 -3404,13 +3404,17 @@@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc
> unsigned int total_data_rate;
> int num_active;
> int id, i;
> + unsigned plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
> + unsigned plane_y_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
> +
> + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
> + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
> + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>
> + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
> + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
> + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
> +
> if (WARN_ON(!state))
> return 0;
>
> Dropping one looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ----
>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index 88e28c9..cc9e0c0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -3411,10 +3411,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>> memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>>
>> - /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> - memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> - memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> -
>> if (WARN_ON(!state))
>> return 0;
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
2016-11-09 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2016-11-09 17:38 ` Matt Roper
2016-11-10 10:03 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matt Roper @ 2016-11-09 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: Vetter, Daniel, intel-gfx, Paulo Zanoni
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:27:37AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:21:22PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >> One of the memsets was added by 5a920b85f2c6 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB
> >> partitioning for multi-screen cases"), and the other was added by
> >> 01c72d6c17 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen
> >> cases"). I'm confused and I'll let the maintainers find out what went
> >> wrong here.
> >>
> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> >
> > I think this is just an artifact of having the patch in both -next and
> > -fixes. The context probably changed later in -next causing a conflict
> > when the two were merged, and then the merge resolution accidentally
> > duplicated this hunk. The merge commit ac4139ed7 is where we wound up
> > with the two copies:
>
> I don't have that merge commit. Is that a nightly rebuild?
Yeah, it's part of a nightly rebuild. Looks like
82282577545 is the equivalent now.
> I don't think we even have this issue in anywhere other than
> nightly. There isn't a branch we could apply this fix to.
Yeah, the patch can't apply anywhere directly, but I thought we could
make rerere forget its resolution of intel_pm.c for that merge and then
fix it by hand so that future merges behave correctly?
Matt
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> >
> > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index db24f89,cc9e0c0..88e28c9
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@@ -3361,11 -3404,13 +3404,17 @@@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc
> > unsigned int total_data_rate;
> > int num_active;
> > int id, i;
> > + unsigned plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
> > + unsigned plane_y_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
> > +
> > + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
> > + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
> > + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
> >
> > + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
> > + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
> > + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
> > +
> > if (WARN_ON(!state))
> > return 0;
> >
> > Dropping one looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ----
> >> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> index 88e28c9..cc9e0c0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> @@ -3411,10 +3411,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> >> memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
> >> memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
> >>
> >> - /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
> >> - memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
> >> - memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
> >> -
> >> if (WARN_ON(!state))
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
2016-11-09 17:38 ` Matt Roper
@ 2016-11-10 10:03 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2016-11-10 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Roper; +Cc: Vetter, Daniel, intel-gfx, Paulo Zanoni
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:27:37AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:21:22PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> >> One of the memsets was added by 5a920b85f2c6 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB
>> >> partitioning for multi-screen cases"), and the other was added by
>> >> 01c72d6c17 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen
>> >> cases"). I'm confused and I'll let the maintainers find out what went
>> >> wrong here.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>> >
>> > I think this is just an artifact of having the patch in both -next and
>> > -fixes. The context probably changed later in -next causing a conflict
>> > when the two were merged, and then the merge resolution accidentally
>> > duplicated this hunk. The merge commit ac4139ed7 is where we wound up
>> > with the two copies:
>>
>> I don't have that merge commit. Is that a nightly rebuild?
>
> Yeah, it's part of a nightly rebuild. Looks like
> 82282577545 is the equivalent now.
>
>> I don't think we even have this issue in anywhere other than
>> nightly. There isn't a branch we could apply this fix to.
>
> Yeah, the patch can't apply anywhere directly, but I thought we could
> make rerere forget its resolution of intel_pm.c for that merge and then
> fix it by hand so that future merges behave correctly?
Only if it was a manual fixup that went wrong. For silent conflicts, we
need to add a fixup patch for the merge.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > index db24f89,cc9e0c0..88e28c9
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > @@@ -3361,11 -3404,13 +3404,17 @@@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc
>> > unsigned int total_data_rate;
>> > int num_active;
>> > int id, i;
>> > + unsigned plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> > + unsigned plane_y_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> > +
>> > + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> > + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> > + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >
>> > + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> > + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> > + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> > +
>> > if (WARN_ON(!state))
>> > return 0;
>> >
>> > Dropping one looks good to me.
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> >
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ----
>> >> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> index 88e28c9..cc9e0c0 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> @@ -3411,10 +3411,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>> >> memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> >> memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >>
>> >> - /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> >> - memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> >> - memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >> -
>> >> if (WARN_ON(!state))
>> >> return 0;
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> 2.7.4
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> >> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-10 10:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-08 17:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() Paulo Zanoni
2016-11-08 18:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-09 1:13 ` [PATCH] " Matt Roper
2016-11-09 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2016-11-09 17:38 ` Matt Roper
2016-11-10 10:03 ` Jani Nikula
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).