From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Quietly reject attempts to create non-pagealigned stolen objects
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:45:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874mrk58pu.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141210102344.GM27182@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 08:17:11AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> This added as a BUG_ON as it considered that no one would ever request
>> an unaligned object. However, it turns out that some BIOSes will
>> allocate a scanout that is offset from 0 and not aligned to a page
>> boundary, and we were passing this through and hitting the BUG_ON during
>> boot.
>>
>> Quietly reject such a request to reserve the unaligned stolen object and
>> let the boot continue, restoring previous behaviour (i.e. no BIOS
>> framebuffer preservation).
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86883
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
>> index 5c616ec2c5c8..a3bc0fa07c6c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
>> @@ -646,13 +646,15 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_device *dev,
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("creating preallocated stolen object: stolen_offset=%x, gtt_offset=%x, size=%x\n",
>> stolen_offset, gtt_offset, size);
>>
>> - /* KISS and expect everything to be page-aligned */
>> - BUG_ON(stolen_offset & 4095);
>> - BUG_ON(size & 4095);
>> -
>> if (WARN_ON(size == 0))
>> return NULL;
>>
>> + /* KISS and expect everything to be GTT page-aligned */
>> + if ((stolen_offset | size) & 4095) {
>
> Imo we should stil WARN_ON and fixup up the takeover code to align things
> properly ...
Can we fix the regression with Chris' patch and do proper stuff when we
figure out what we want to do?
BR,
Jani.
> -daniel
>
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("request for unaligned stolen object, denied\n");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> stolen = kzalloc(sizeof(*stolen), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!stolen)
>> return NULL;
>> --
>> 2.1.3
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-21 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-10 8:17 [PATCH] drm/i915: Quietly reject attempts to create non-pagealigned stolen objects Chris Wilson
2014-12-10 10:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-10 11:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2014-12-10 13:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-10 14:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-12-19 12:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-12-19 14:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-21 17:45 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2015-01-21 18:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-21 22:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2015-02-10 12:34 ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-10 15:04 ` shuang.he
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874mrk58pu.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox