* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl
2014-11-12 14:40 [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl Imre Deak
@ 2014-11-12 15:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-11-13 12:58 ` [PATCH] tests/pm_rpm: add gem-evict-pwrite subtest Imre Deak
2014-11-13 2:10 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to shuang.he
2014-12-16 18:12 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl Imre Deak
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2014-11-12 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Imre Deak; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:40:35PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Without this RPM ref we can hit the device suspended WARN via:
> i915_gem_object_pin()->ggtt_bind_vma->gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(). I
> noticed this on my BYT while keeping the i915 device in runtime
> suspended state for a while. I chose this place to take the ref to
> avoid the possible deadlock via the mutex_lock taken both later in this
> function and in the runtime suspend handler. This can happen if an RPM
> suspend event is queued and need to be flushed before taking the RPM
> ref.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
We should be able to hit this easily with an igt by doing a pwrite to an
object which is attached to a cursor. I.e.
1. Set up mode with cursor visible.
2. dpms off
-> ensure rpm is entered
3. pwrite to cursor -> boom.
Can you please add this as a new subtest to pm_rpm.c? I think it should
fit fairly easily there.
Thanks, Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 86cf428..ec2ee28 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1075,6 +1075,7 @@ int
> i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct drm_i915_gem_pwrite *args = data;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> int ret;
> @@ -1094,9 +1095,11 @@ i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +
> ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto put_rpm;
>
> obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, args->handle));
> if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> @@ -1148,6 +1151,9 @@ out:
> drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +put_rpm:
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to
2014-11-12 14:40 [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl Imre Deak
2014-11-12 15:32 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2014-11-13 2:10 ` shuang.he
2014-12-16 18:12 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl Imre Deak
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: shuang.he @ 2014-11-13 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shuang.he, intel-gfx, imre.deak
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate->patch_applied_pass_rate
BYT: pass/total=291/291->290/291
PNV: pass/total=356/356->356/356
ILK: pass/total=372/372->371/372
IVB: pass/total=545/546->543/546
SNB: pass/total=380/380->379/380
HSW: pass/total=579/579->579/579
BDW: pass/total=422/423->422/423
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
test_platform: test_suite, test_case, result_with_drm_intel_nightly(count, machine_id...)...->result_with_patch_applied(count, machine_id)...
BYT: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_setmode_invalid-clone-single-crtc, TIMEOUT(9, M36M31)PASS(1, M31) -> TIMEOUT(1, M31)PASS(3, M31)
ILK: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_setmode_invalid-clone-single-crtc, FAIL(2, M26)DMESG_FAIL(1, M26)TIMEOUT(13, M37M6M26)PASS(1, M26) -> TIMEOUT(1, M37)PASS(3, M37)
IVB: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gem_bad_reloc_negative-reloc, NSPT(5, M21M34)PASS(8, M34M21) -> NSPT(1, M21)PASS(3, M21)
IVB: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_cursor_crc_cursor-128x128-sliding, PASS(4, M21) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M21)PASS(3, M21)
IVB: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_cursor_crc_cursor-64x64-offscreen, PASS(4, M21) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M21)PASS(3, M21)
IVB: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_setmode_invalid-clone-single-crtc, TIMEOUT(12, M34M21)PASS(1, M21) -> TIMEOUT(1, M21)PASS(3, M21)
SNB: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_setmode_invalid-clone-single-crtc, TIMEOUT(18, M35M22)PASS(1, M35) -> TIMEOUT(1, M22)PASS(3, M22)
BDW: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gem_reset_stats_ban-bsd, DMESG_WARN(1, M28)PASS(15, M42M30M28) -> PASS(4, M42)
BDW: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_setmode_invalid-clone-single-crtc, TIMEOUT(15, M42M30M28)PASS(1, M28) -> TIMEOUT(1, M42)PASS(3, M42)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl
2014-11-12 14:40 [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl Imre Deak
2014-11-12 15:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-11-13 2:10 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing rpm ref to shuang.he
@ 2014-12-16 18:12 ` Imre Deak
2014-12-18 13:45 ` Jani Nikula
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2014-12-16 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 16:40 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Without this RPM ref we can hit the device suspended WARN via:
> i915_gem_object_pin()->ggtt_bind_vma->gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(). I
> noticed this on my BYT while keeping the i915 device in runtime
> suspended state for a while. I chose this place to take the ref to
> avoid the possible deadlock via the mutex_lock taken both later in this
> function and in the runtime suspend handler. This can happen if an RPM
> suspend event is queued and need to be flushed before taking the RPM
> ref.
Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/gem-evict-pwrite
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87363
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 86cf428..ec2ee28 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1075,6 +1075,7 @@ int
> i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct drm_i915_gem_pwrite *args = data;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> int ret;
> @@ -1094,9 +1095,11 @@ i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +
> ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto put_rpm;
>
> obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, args->handle));
> if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> @@ -1148,6 +1151,9 @@ out:
> drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +put_rpm:
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread