From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B2BC77B7C for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A3A10E344; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588C210E335; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:49:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1682545783; x=1714081783; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=JvB+zH/w7Zg7QLpT2xpgZv/ZCDmPmiI5bV0t6T3A7GE=; b=E+W8VV1hXbOB7bxNERsT0F++T7Ni7Lml1sLXk3Cqvx+a70HeePG1It6B JvLiLdFwS2/vXGFQjHBSC01yxuVnryveFf18MNqYlDwivJAhh/8zr+eRY qdqhtlKjFntIMP9Ai/WEAFeg74e2zZkBxmw/IxJJU242Zj0saoMNkGcGX g8jT4d8NCP0aKKXRJGTiXqEq3Hsk+InhtFNX00VW/OIR+uQynb9nnMwAM gPGCB9OTPr8VrmBxalktVVVAmtSKUEhKFgV+3ecMYLh8M6ckAkOYyTpbu 1eZYyv40pgd57a+029oq5rYTzxciqupqRaSeWN/dANtA8NOTJTD/XMYH9 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10692"; a="336171518" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,229,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="336171518" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Apr 2023 14:49:41 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10692"; a="758791486" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,229,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="758791486" Received: from adixit-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO adixit-arch.intel.com) ([10.212.242.96]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Apr 2023 14:49:41 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:49:40 -0700 Message-ID: <875y9i9uvf.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com In-Reply-To: <20230425201926.99086-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> References: <20230425201926.99086-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> <20230425201926.99086-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/28.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tools/intel_error_decode: Correctly name the GuC CT buffer X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:19:26 -0700, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote: > > From: John Harrison > > The buffer decoding code doesn't cope well with unknown buffers. So > add an entry for the GuC CTB so that it gets decoded correctly. Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit > > Signed-off-by: John Harrison > --- > tools/intel_error_decode.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tools/intel_error_decode.c b/tools/intel_error_decode.c > index 99680bedc785..451608826be3 100644 > --- a/tools/intel_error_decode.c > +++ b/tools/intel_error_decode.c > @@ -617,6 +617,7 @@ read_data_file(FILE *file) > { "user", "user", 0 }, > { "semaphores", "semaphores", 0 }, > { "guc log buffer", "GuC log", 0 }, > + { "guc ct buffer", "GuC CTB", 0 }, > { }, > }, *b; > char *new_ring_name; > -- > 2.39.1 >