Re: [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Rename edp vdd funcs for consistency

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> edp_* are now the lower level functions and intel_edp_* the higher level
> ones. One should use them in pairs.

Yeah I should've done this when I added the lower level ones. One thing
you need to fix below though.

> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 28d0183..30943a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static struct intel_dp *intel_attached_dp(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_dp_link_down(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -static bool _edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +static bool edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  static void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync);
>  
>  int
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	bool has_aux_irq = HAS_AUX_IRQ(dev);
>  	bool vdd;
>  
> -	vdd = _edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> +	vdd = edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/* dp aux is extremely sensitive to irq latency, hence request the
>  	 * lowest possible wakeup latency and so prevent the cpu from going into
> @@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ static  u32 ironlake_get_pp_control(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	return control;
>  }
>  
> -static bool _edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static bool edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
>  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static bool _edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  void intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	if (is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> -		bool vdd = _edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> +		bool vdd = edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
>  
>  		WARN(!vdd, "eDP VDD already requested on\n");
>  	}
> @@ -1299,6 +1299,11 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
>  		edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off(intel_dp);
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
> +{
> +	return edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, sync);

Please don't return voids. With that fixed,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


> +}
> +
>  void intel_edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
> @@ -2102,7 +2107,7 @@ static void intel_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  	intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
>  	intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
>  	intel_edp_panel_on(intel_dp);
> -	edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, true);
> +	intel_edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, true);
>  	intel_dp_complete_link_train(intel_dp);
>  	intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
>  }
> @@ -3405,7 +3410,7 @@ intel_dp_probe_oui(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Branch OUI: %02hx%02hx%02hx\n",
>  			      buf[0], buf[1], buf[2]);
>  
> -	edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
> +	intel_edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> @@ -3429,7 +3434,7 @@ intel_dp_probe_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  			intel_dp->is_mst = false;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
> +	intel_edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
>  
>  	drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, intel_dp->is_mst);
>  	return intel_dp->is_mst;
> @@ -4527,7 +4532,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	/* Cache DPCD and EDID for edp. */
>  	intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
>  	has_dpcd = intel_dp_get_dpcd(intel_dp);
> -	edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
> +	intel_edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
>  
>  	if (has_dpcd) {
>  		if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= 0x11)
> -- 
> 1.8.5.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx