From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D89DC38142 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2581610E37A; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA79C10E2AB; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:36:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1675190211; x=1706726211; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=c9rFDoJ6u09kXmrA/WHQ5WkdMaSZFCldDwZ+ZgEXMzc=; b=IZsJxfnU6ul6O/v/eWroRQ5qse7rbXYlAHPTGKe5eW1ZF/pWZFsWBN+t IlwQJGukXdOCRAmGSFvUvK1KSd2L/mf7Wpq+4jvhxXjvA3IN1Gd4P1TYV 1BCxyL4rYewCNvZ6p+01Penh+K7a+Hxm5k950bq+ODtUWfss/CZKCxpcw p67DCvyg2mNKVE5NGC4Yz6t00Q4c6axwQFkduo0Egij1BxSMimm7BPOQr GJzz3Ii421eJ+kabGb2sz6J1Bn3DJuwZwEgsHTxTMaY8keQmaYY9iDp9v nyL/EblgvrDfQQ6OAKKpAZlrveROiPLRAAHSLlPnQLyak5+QS8RRwUB0y Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10607"; a="308264410" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,261,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="308264410" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Jan 2023 10:36:50 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10607"; a="788547794" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,261,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="788547794" Received: from adixit-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO adixit-arch.intel.com) ([10.209.70.92]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Jan 2023 10:36:50 -0800 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:36:50 -0800 Message-ID: <877cx2v9dp.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" To: Janusz Krzysztofik In-Reply-To: <1949047.usQuhbGJ8B@jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20230131091731.5892-1-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> <87a61yvfq3.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> <1949047.usQuhbGJ8B@jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/28.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/i915/perf: Add stress / race exercises X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Arkadiusz Hiler , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Petri Latvala , Chris Wilson Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:36:30 -0800, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > Since Chris' subtest didn't help in triggering the list corruption, I've > developed a new subtest that can do it. Since it is almost identical to the > one Chris added, I decided to reuse his code, then add my new subtest to perf > as well. But maybe you are right that my subtest better fits to another test. > not perf. I'll think this over. > > I hope this clarifies things for you. Thanks Janusz. Of course the test is valid but because it is not triggering bugs in perf perhaps it is better added to a different IGT file. Maybe gem_ctx_persistence? Maybe perf is also ok. Anyway something to think about. Thanks. -- Ashutosh