From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: s/dev->dev_private/to_i915(dev)/ Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:51:32 +0300 Message-ID: <877g5o3fqj.fsf@intel.com> References: <1400012520-15802-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1400012520-15802-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20140513145628.4aed25c9@jbarnes-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B186E373 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 01:51:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140513145628.4aed25c9@jbarnes-desktop> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Jesse Barnes , Daniel Vetter Cc: Intel Graphics Development List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 14 May 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2014 22:22:00 +0200 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> coccinelle is seriously a tool I should have played around with much >> earlier. Extremely powerful, and extremely dangerous in causing >> massive conflict hell for everyone else since doing large-scale stuff >> is so much easier than with sed. >> >> Way, way too easy. > > Why? For an eventual move to embedding drm_device in i915? Looks like the reason for this change is clearly explained in the commit message above! :p Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center