From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Add support for port enable/disable for dual link configuration
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:23:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878uirbj1n.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417254967-27384-4-git-send-email-gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com> wrote:
> For Dual Link MIPI Panels, both Port A and Port C should be enabled
> during the MIPI encoder enabling sequence. Similarly, during the
> disabling sequence, both ports needs to be disabled.
>
> v2: Used for_each_dsi_port macro instead of for loop
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 7 +++++
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index dc03fac..c981f5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -6664,6 +6664,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
> #define DPI_ENABLE (1 << 31) /* A + C */
> #define MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_SHIFT 27
> #define MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_MASK (0xf << 27)
> +#define DUAL_LINK_MODE_SHIFT 26
> #define DUAL_LINK_MODE_MASK (1 << 26)
> #define DUAL_LINK_MODE_FRONT_BACK (0 << 26)
> #define DUAL_LINK_MODE_PIXEL_ALTERNATIVE (1 << 26)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 693736b..1163a5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -108,28 +108,43 @@ static void intel_dsi_port_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> - enum port port = intel_dsi_pipe_to_port(intel_crtc->pipe);
> + enum port port;
> u32 temp;
>
> - /* assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> - temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port)) & ~LANE_CONFIGURATION_MASK;
> - temp = temp | intel_dsi->port_bits;
> - I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), temp | DPI_ENABLE);
> - POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> + for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> + temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +
> + if (intel_dsi->dual_link) {
> + if (port == PORT_A)
> + intel_dsi->port_bits |= intel_crtc->pipe ?
> + LANE_CONFIGURATION_DUAL_LINK_B :
> + LANE_CONFIGURATION_DUAL_LINK_A;
> + else
> + intel_dsi->port_bits = 0;
It feels wrong to clobber intel_dsi->port_bits here; the old code didn't
do that either. I think you should either set port_bits somewhere else
(or remove it altogether), and then modify temp depending on port.
Side note, it seems to me intel_dsi->dual_link is becoming redundant, as
intel_dsi->ports will have more than one bit set in the dual link
case. This can be a future cleanup though.
BR,
Jani.
> + } else
> + temp &= ~LANE_CONFIGURATION_MASK;
> +
> + /* assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> + temp = temp | intel_dsi->port_bits;
> + I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), temp | DPI_ENABLE);
> + POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> + }
> }
>
> static void intel_dsi_port_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> - enum port port = intel_dsi_pipe_to_port(intel_crtc->pipe);
> + struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> + enum port port;
> u32 temp;
>
> - /* de-assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> - temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> - I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), temp & ~DPI_ENABLE);
> - POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> + for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> + /* de-assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> + temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> + I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), temp & ~DPI_ENABLE);
> + POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> + }
> }
>
> static void intel_dsi_device_ready(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> index 7f5d028..f2cc2fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct intel_dsi {
> u8 clock_stop;
>
> u8 escape_clk_div;
> + u8 dual_link;
> u32 port_bits;
> u32 bw_timer;
> u32 dphy_reg;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> index 612592f..7f1ba58 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> @@ -287,6 +287,13 @@ static bool generic_init(struct intel_dsi_device *dsi)
> intel_dsi->clock_stop = mipi_config->enable_clk_stop ? 1 : 0;
> intel_dsi->lane_count = mipi_config->lane_cnt + 1;
> intel_dsi->pixel_format = mipi_config->videomode_color_format << 7;
> + intel_dsi->dual_link = mipi_config->dual_link;
> +
> + if (intel_dsi->dual_link) {
> + intel_dsi->ports = ((1 << PORT_A) | (1 << PORT_C));
> + intel_dsi->port_bits = (intel_dsi->dual_link - 1)
> + << DUAL_LINK_MODE_SHIFT;
> + }
>
> if (intel_dsi->pixel_format == VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666)
> bits_per_pixel = 18;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-01 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-29 9:55 [PATCH 0/9] BYT DSI Dual Link Support Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: New functions added for enabling & disabling MIPI Port Ctrl reg Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Added port as parameter to the functions which does read/write of DSI Controller Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-01 13:40 ` Jani Nikula
2014-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Add support for port enable/disable for dual link configuration Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-01 13:23 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-12-01 14:11 ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-01 18:05 ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-01 19:21 ` Jani Nikula
2014-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Pixel Clock changes for DSI dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Dual link needs Shutdown and Turn on packet for both ports Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Enable DSI PLL for both DSI0 and DSI1 in case of dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-01 13:27 ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-01 17:37 ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: MIPI Timings related changes for " Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Update the DSI disable path to support dual link panel disabling Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Update the DSI enable path to support dual link panel enabling Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-03 17:34 ` shuang.he
2014-12-01 13:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] BYT DSI Dual Link Support Jani Nikula
2014-12-04 5:37 ` Singh, Gaurav K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878uirbj1n.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gaurav.k.singh@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox