public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Add support for port	enable/disable for dual link configuration
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:23:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878uirbj1n.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417254967-27384-4-git-send-email-gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>

On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com> wrote:
> For Dual Link MIPI Panels, both Port A and Port C should be enabled
> during the MIPI encoder enabling sequence. Similarly, during the
> disabling sequence, both ports needs to be disabled.
>
> v2: Used for_each_dsi_port macro instead of for loop
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h            |    1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c           |   39 +++++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h           |    1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c |    7 +++++
>  4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index dc03fac..c981f5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -6664,6 +6664,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
>  #define  DPI_ENABLE					(1 << 31) /* A + C */
>  #define  MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_SHIFT		27
>  #define  MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_MASK		(0xf << 27)
> +#define  DUAL_LINK_MODE_SHIFT				26
>  #define  DUAL_LINK_MODE_MASK				(1 << 26)
>  #define  DUAL_LINK_MODE_FRONT_BACK			(0 << 26)
>  #define  DUAL_LINK_MODE_PIXEL_ALTERNATIVE		(1 << 26)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 693736b..1163a5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -108,28 +108,43 @@ static void intel_dsi_port_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
>  	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> -	enum port port = intel_dsi_pipe_to_port(intel_crtc->pipe);
> +	enum port port;
>  	u32 temp;
>  
> -	/* assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> -	temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port)) & ~LANE_CONFIGURATION_MASK;
> -	temp = temp | intel_dsi->port_bits;
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), temp | DPI_ENABLE);
> -	POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +	for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> +		temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +
> +		if (intel_dsi->dual_link) {
> +			if (port == PORT_A)
> +				intel_dsi->port_bits |= intel_crtc->pipe ?
> +					LANE_CONFIGURATION_DUAL_LINK_B :
> +					LANE_CONFIGURATION_DUAL_LINK_A;
> +			else
> +				intel_dsi->port_bits = 0;

It feels wrong to clobber intel_dsi->port_bits here; the old code didn't
do that either. I think you should either set port_bits somewhere else
(or remove it altogether), and then modify temp depending on port.

Side note, it seems to me intel_dsi->dual_link is becoming redundant, as
intel_dsi->ports will have more than one bit set in the dual link
case. This can be a future cleanup though.

BR,
Jani.

> +		} else
> +			temp &= ~LANE_CONFIGURATION_MASK;
> +
> +		/* assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> +		temp = temp | intel_dsi->port_bits;
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), temp | DPI_ENABLE);
> +		POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_dsi_port_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> -	enum port port = intel_dsi_pipe_to_port(intel_crtc->pipe);
> +	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +	enum port port;
>  	u32 temp;
>  
> -	/* de-assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> -	temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), temp & ~DPI_ENABLE);
> -	POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +	for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> +		/* de-assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> +		temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), temp & ~DPI_ENABLE);
> +		POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_dsi_device_ready(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> index 7f5d028..f2cc2fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct intel_dsi {
>  	u8 clock_stop;
>  
>  	u8 escape_clk_div;
> +	u8 dual_link;
>  	u32 port_bits;
>  	u32 bw_timer;
>  	u32 dphy_reg;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> index 612592f..7f1ba58 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> @@ -287,6 +287,13 @@ static bool generic_init(struct intel_dsi_device *dsi)
>  	intel_dsi->clock_stop = mipi_config->enable_clk_stop ? 1 : 0;
>  	intel_dsi->lane_count = mipi_config->lane_cnt + 1;
>  	intel_dsi->pixel_format = mipi_config->videomode_color_format << 7;
> +	intel_dsi->dual_link = mipi_config->dual_link;
> +
> +	if (intel_dsi->dual_link) {
> +		intel_dsi->ports = ((1 << PORT_A) | (1 << PORT_C));
> +		intel_dsi->port_bits = (intel_dsi->dual_link - 1)
> +					<< DUAL_LINK_MODE_SHIFT;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (intel_dsi->pixel_format == VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666)
>  		bits_per_pixel = 18;
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-01 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-29  9:55 [PATCH 0/9] BYT DSI Dual Link Support Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29  9:55 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: New functions added for enabling & disabling MIPI Port Ctrl reg Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29  9:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Added port as parameter to the functions which does read/write of DSI Controller Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-01 13:40   ` Jani Nikula
2014-11-29  9:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Add support for port enable/disable for dual link configuration Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-01 13:23   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-12-01 14:11     ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-01 18:05       ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-01 19:21         ` Jani Nikula
2014-11-29  9:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Pixel Clock changes for DSI dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29  9:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Dual link needs Shutdown and Turn on packet for both ports Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29  9:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Enable DSI PLL for both DSI0 and DSI1 in case of dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-01 13:27   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-01 17:37     ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-11-29  9:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: MIPI Timings related changes for " Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29  9:56 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Update the DSI disable path to support dual link panel disabling Gaurav K Singh
2014-11-29  9:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Update the DSI enable path to support dual link panel enabling Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-03 17:34   ` shuang.he
2014-12-01 13:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] BYT DSI Dual Link Support Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:37   ` Singh, Gaurav K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878uirbj1n.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gaurav.k.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox