From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add a DRM property "psr"
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:25:51 +0200
Message-ID: <87a9cl2e8w.fsf@intel.com>
References: <1395172267-9203-1-git-send-email-sivachandra@chromium.org>
 <20140318130620.07fa8680@jbarnes-desktop>
 <CAGyQ6gzRPNRpCDHWLL3P6_+E52v2XjZuOfNOqrQ-=Zvc5aOPCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140319084438.GM30571@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <20140319150338.GA27717@strange.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <CAGyQ6gyeBXtrM88tBFZm00UMP+8yH2SRdUA4yWDhGYUGZy6mhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87r45xw3a0.fsf@intel.com>
 <CAGyQ6gymV9m7KL4ect++psOY3_tqRwGoGxknDP5bBU06fmp80g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3451E6E072
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 06:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gymV9m7KL4ect++psOY3_tqRwGoGxknDP5bBU06fmp80g@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Jani Nikula
> <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> If this is for testing only, and the module parameter does not quite cut
>> it, please add it to debugfs. That we can pretty much change at will.
>
> If I understand correctly, you are suggesting that the on/off knob
> live in debugfs. So, should the module param in sysfs mirror this
> debugfs knob?

I guess the simplest thing to move forward would be something to update
psr state after the module parameter has been changed, although it's
perhaps a bit clumsy to use.

Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center