public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: increase the SWSCI DSLP default timeout to 50ms
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:13:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bo2x69ws.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381347597-1505-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>

On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> The spec says the default timeout should be 2ms, but on my machine
> this doesn't seem to be enough. Sometimes it works, sometimes I get
> these messages when booting:
>   - SWSCI request timed out

BTW if this happens, and BIOS missed our call, will anyone clear
SWSCI_SCIC_INDICATOR? If not, we're bound to keep hitting:

>   - SWSCI request already in progress

So maybe we should just clear SWSCI_SCIC_INDICATOR ourselves on timeout?
Would that help?

In any case, this patch is

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


> And my guess is that the "already in progress" message is because the
> first one is still happening.
>
> I did some experiments on my machine (that has CONFIG_HZ=1000) and the
> wait_for function usually takes 4-6 jiffies to finish, but I've seen
> up to 9. So increase the timeout to 50ms. We only expect to wait for
> the actual amount of time the operation takes, so even a huge timeout
> shouldn't delay us more than what the hardware actually requires.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> index 2acf5ca..9044640 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,9 @@ static int swsci(struct drm_device *dev, u32 function, u32 parm, u32 *parm_out)
>  	/* Driver sleep timeout in ms. */
>  	dslp = ioread32(&swsci->dslp);
>  	if (!dslp) {
> -		dslp = 2;
> +		/* The spec says 2ms should be the default, but it's too small
> +		 * for some machines. */
> +		dslp = 50;
>  	} else if (dslp > 500) {
>  		/* Hey bios, trust must be earned. */
>  		WARN_ONCE(1, "excessive driver sleep timeout (DSPL) %u\n", dslp);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-10  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-09 19:39 [PATCH] drm/i915: increase the SWSCI DSLP default timeout to 50ms Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-10  4:13 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2013-10-11 20:29   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-11 21:21     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bo2x69ws.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox