From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>,
Wei Shun Chen <wei.shun.chang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:05:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1f0zwc5.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486031230-4914-1-git-send-email-shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
> From: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
>
> When user space link status, display driver read DPCD register
> 0x202, 0x203 and 0x204 to identify sink status. When PSR exit
> is ongoing before EQ done. Panel will report EQ & symbol lock
> not done. Both of them are under progressing at the same time
> to cause this issue.
>
> This WA try to read link status more times if EQ not done.
> Panel spec request at least 1000us for fast link train when
> PSR exit. So driver will wait 1000us~1500us then retrieve
> sink link status again.
I'm not sure about the patch, but no matter what it needs to be rebased
on top of current drm-tip to even be considered.
If you're working around a specific eDP PSR issue, why do this on *all*
DP?
BR,
Jani.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99639
> TEST=Reboot DUT and no flicking on local display at login screen
>
> Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
> Cc: Wei Shun Chen <wei.shun.chang@intel.com>
> Cc: Gary C Wang <gary.c.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee, Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index e80d620846c8..a9a6ce476438 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4136,13 +4136,36 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return;
>
> /* if link training is requested we should perform it always */
> - if ((intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) ||
> - (!drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count))) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: channel EQ not ok, retraining\n",
> - intel_encoder->base.name);
> + if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: compliance test mode, retraining\n",
> + intel_encoder->base.name);
> + } else {
> + u8 retry;
> +
> + for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> + if (!drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count)) {
> + /*
> + * EQ not ok may caused by fast link train while exit PSR active,
> + * wait at least 1000 us then read it again.
> + */
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: channel EQ not ok, retry = %d, DPCD 0x202 = 0x%x, 0x203 = 0x%x, 0x204 = 0x%x\n",
> + intel_encoder->base.name, retry, link_status[0], link_status[1], link_status[2]);
> + usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> + if (!intel_dp_get_link_status(intel_dp, link_status)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to get link status\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* channel EQ is fine */
> + return;
> + }
> + }
>
> - intel_dp_retrain_link(intel_dp);
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: channel EQ not ok, retraining\n",
> + intel_encoder->base.name);
> }
> +
> + intel_dp_retrain_link(intel_dp);
> }
>
> /*
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-02 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-02 10:27 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done Lee, Shawn C
2017-02-02 11:05 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-03-02 8:30 ` Lee, Shawn C
2017-03-02 8:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Lee, Shawn C
2017-03-07 20:00 ` Jani Nikula
2017-03-13 8:12 ` [PATCH v3] " Lee, Shawn C
2017-03-31 23:25 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-04-03 21:57 ` Jim Bride
2017-04-25 10:09 ` [PATCH v4] drm/i915/edp: " Lee, Shawn C
2017-03-02 9:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done (rev3) Patchwork
2017-03-13 8:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done (rev4) Patchwork
2017-04-25 9:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done (rev5) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d1f0zwc5.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=cooper.chiou@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shawn.c.lee@intel.com \
--cc=wei.shun.chang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).