From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com>,
"# v4 . 9-rc1+" <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Limit Valleyview and earlier to only using mappable scanout
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:29:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1ibiiv3.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161104110838.3279-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Fri, 04 Nov 2016, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Valleyview and Cherryview are definitely limited to only scanning out
> from the first 256MiB and 512MiB of the Global GTT respectively. Lets
> presume that this behaviour was inherited from the display block copied
> from g4x (not Ironlake) and all earlier generations are similarly
> affected. For simplicity, impose that these platforms must scanout from
> the mappable region.
>
> Reported-by: Luis Botello <luis.botello.ortega@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98036
> Fixes: 2efb813d5388 ("drm/i915: Fallback to using unmappable memory for scanout")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.9-rc1+
> ---
> This leaves Ironlake -> Haswell with a bit of uncertainity. It is also
> not clear if the scanout accessible region is similarly limited on all
> gen8+, and so whether we need to similarly curtain the upper range for
> their scanouts.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 269e2487c104..408875fbec66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3661,8 +3661,22 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> if (view->type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL)
> vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(obj, view, 0, alignment,
> PIN_MAPPABLE | PIN_NONBLOCK);
> - if (IS_ERR(vma))
> - vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(obj, view, 0, alignment, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
> + unsigned int flags;
> +
> + /* Valleyview and Cherryview are definitely limited to scanning
> + * out the first 256MiB and 512MiB respectively. Lets presume
> + * this behaviour was inherited from their g4x display engine
> + * and that all earlier gen are similarly limited.
> + */
> + flags = 0;
> + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 5 ||
> + IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) ||
> + IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
Since it's related to the display engine, HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY()?
BR,
Jani.
> + flags = PIN_MAPPABLE;
> + vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(obj, view, 0, alignment, flags);
> + }
> if (IS_ERR(vma))
> goto err_unpin_display;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-04 11:08 [PATCH] drm/i915: Limit Valleyview and earlier to only using mappable scanout Chris Wilson
2016-11-04 11:29 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2016-11-04 11:41 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-04 11:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-04 12:59 ` [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-04 13:06 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-04 14:17 ` Jani Nikula
2016-11-07 10:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-07 11:00 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
2016-11-07 11:01 ` [PATCH v4] " Chris Wilson
2016-11-07 11:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-07 12:28 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d1ibiiv3.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akash.goel@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).