From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: convert fsb_freq and mem_freq to kHz
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 10:01:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frtziy13.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529211655.GU4990@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, 29 May 2024, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 05:24:55PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> We'll want to use fsb frequency for deriving GT clock and rawclk
>> frequencies in the future. Increase the accuracy by converting to
>> kHz. Do the same for mem freq to be aligned.
>>
>> Round the frequencies ending in 666 to 667.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Would it be worth adding a "_khz" suffix to the structure fields to help
> clarify the units?
Thought about it, but decided kHz is pretty much the norm, and it's
everything else that should have a suffix to clarify the units!
> Either way,
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Thanks,
Jani.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c | 6 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c | 50 +++++++++++++-------------
>> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c
>> index 8b8a0f305c3a..08c5d122af8f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c
>> @@ -83,14 +83,14 @@ static const struct cxsr_latency *pnv_get_cxsr_latency(struct drm_i915_private *
>>
>> if (is_desktop == latency->is_desktop &&
>> i915->is_ddr3 == latency->is_ddr3 &&
>> - i915->fsb_freq == latency->fsb_freq &&
>> - i915->mem_freq == latency->mem_freq)
>> + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(i915->fsb_freq, 1000) == latency->fsb_freq &&
>> + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(i915->mem_freq, 1000) == latency->mem_freq)
>> return latency;
>> }
>>
>> err:
>> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>> - "Could not find CxSR latency for DDR%s, FSB %u MHz, MEM %u MHz\n",
>> + "Could not find CxSR latency for DDR%s, FSB %u kHz, MEM %u kHz\n",
>> i915->is_ddr3 ? "3" : "2", i915->fsb_freq, i915->mem_freq);
>>
>> return NULL;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> index c9cb2a391942..5d3de1cddcf6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> @@ -280,9 +280,9 @@ static void gen5_rps_init(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> u32 rgvmodectl;
>> int c_m, i;
>>
>> - if (i915->fsb_freq <= 3200)
>> + if (i915->fsb_freq <= 3200000)
>> c_m = 0;
>> - else if (i915->fsb_freq <= 4800)
>> + else if (i915->fsb_freq <= 4800000)
>> c_m = 1;
>> else
>> c_m = 2;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> index 266ed6cfa485..ace9372244a4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> @@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ static unsigned int pnv_mem_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>
>> switch (tmp & CLKCFG_MEM_MASK) {
>> case CLKCFG_MEM_533:
>> - return 533;
>> + return 533333;
>> case CLKCFG_MEM_667:
>> - return 667;
>> + return 666667;
>> case CLKCFG_MEM_800:
>> - return 800;
>> + return 800000;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -73,13 +73,13 @@ static unsigned int ilk_mem_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> ddrpll = intel_uncore_read16(&dev_priv->uncore, DDRMPLL1);
>> switch (ddrpll & 0xff) {
>> case 0xc:
>> - return 800;
>> + return 800000;
>> case 0x10:
>> - return 1066;
>> + return 1066667;
>> case 0x14:
>> - return 1333;
>> + return 1333333;
>> case 0x18:
>> - return 1600;
>> + return 1600000;
>> default:
>> drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm, "unknown memory frequency 0x%02x\n",
>> ddrpll & 0xff);
>> @@ -97,9 +97,9 @@ static unsigned int chv_mem_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>
>> switch ((val >> 2) & 0x7) {
>> case 3:
>> - return 2000;
>> + return 2000000;
>> default:
>> - return 1600;
>> + return 1600000;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -114,11 +114,11 @@ static unsigned int vlv_mem_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> switch ((val >> 6) & 3) {
>> case 0:
>> case 1:
>> - return 800;
>> + return 800000;
>> case 2:
>> - return 1066;
>> + return 1066667;
>> case 3:
>> - return 1333;
>> + return 1333333;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void detect_mem_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> i915->is_ddr3 = pnv_is_ddr3(i915);
>>
>> if (i915->mem_freq)
>> - drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "DDR speed: %d MHz\n", i915->mem_freq);
>> + drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "DDR speed: %d kHz\n", i915->mem_freq);
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned int pnv_fsb_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> @@ -150,13 +150,13 @@ static unsigned int pnv_fsb_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>
>> switch (fsb) {
>> case CLKCFG_FSB_400:
>> - return 400;
>> + return 400000;
>> case CLKCFG_FSB_533:
>> - return 533;
>> + return 533333;
>> case CLKCFG_FSB_667:
>> - return 667;
>> + return 666667;
>> case CLKCFG_FSB_800:
>> - return 800;
>> + return 800000;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -170,19 +170,19 @@ static unsigned int ilk_fsb_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>
>> switch (fsb) {
>> case 0x00c:
>> - return 3200;
>> + return 3200000;
>> case 0x00e:
>> - return 3733;
>> + return 3733333;
>> case 0x010:
>> - return 4266;
>> + return 4266667;
>> case 0x012:
>> - return 4800;
>> + return 4800000;
>> case 0x014:
>> - return 5333;
>> + return 5333333;
>> case 0x016:
>> - return 5866;
>> + return 5866667;
>> case 0x018:
>> - return 6400;
>> + return 6400000;
>> default:
>> drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm, "unknown fsb frequency 0x%04x\n", fsb);
>> return 0;
>> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static void detect_fsb_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> i915->fsb_freq = pnv_fsb_freq(i915);
>>
>> if (i915->fsb_freq)
>> - drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "FSB frequency: %d MHz\n", i915->fsb_freq);
>> + drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "FSB frequency: %d kHz\n", i915->fsb_freq);
>> }
>>
>> static int intel_dimm_num_devices(const struct dram_dimm_info *dimm)
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-30 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 14:24 [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: mem/fsb/rawclk freq cleanups Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/wm: rename intel_get_cxsr_latency -> pnv_get_cxsr_latency Jani Nikula
2024-05-29 20:53 ` Matt Roper
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/wm: clarify logging on not finding CxSR latency config Jani Nikula
2024-05-29 21:00 ` Matt Roper
2024-05-30 6:59 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/dram: separate fsb freq detection from mem freq Jani Nikula
2024-05-29 21:08 ` Matt Roper
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/dram: split out pnv DDR3 detection Jani Nikula
2024-05-29 21:12 ` Matt Roper
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/dram: rearrange mem freq init Jani Nikula
2024-05-29 21:13 ` Matt Roper
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: convert fsb_freq and mem_freq to kHz Jani Nikula
2024-05-29 21:16 ` Matt Roper
2024-05-30 7:01 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-06-05 10:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-06-05 12:42 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: extend the fsb_freq initialization to more platforms Jani Nikula
2024-05-29 21:39 ` Matt Roper
2024-05-30 7:14 ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-04 11:46 ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-05 10:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-06-05 10:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-06-06 10:37 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: use i9xx_fsb_freq() for GT clock frequency Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/cdclk: use i9xx_fsb_freq() for rawclk_freq initialization Jani Nikula
2024-06-05 10:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-05-28 14:24 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: move rawclk init to intel_cdclk_init() Jani Nikula
2024-05-29 10:26 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 14:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: move rawclk from runtime to display runtime info Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 14:25 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/xe/display: drop unused rawclk_freq and RUNTIME_INFO() Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 16:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: mem/fsb/rawclk freq cleanups Patchwork
2024-05-28 16:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-05-29 10:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87frtziy13.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).