From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Display uncore
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:23:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftjbaor7.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190808014423.20377-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
On Wed, 07 Aug 2019, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> wrote:
> I've been trying to identify MMIO ranges to clearly define what belongs
> to display_uncore to do a check on access, but there are lots of
> exceptions and differences across gens (with a few more coming with TGL),
> so I don't think that's a viable way. The alternative option implemented
> here is to differentiate the register by type, which should ensure we
> never mix them up, but at the cost of a more complex transition.
>
> Thoughts? I'm very open to (and I actually hope for) better ideas.
Has there been any progress in this front lately, or have I just missed
it?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/3] Display uncore
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:23:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftjbaor7.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191029092356.kB2lSwsmT1PlEsF9Lyx8T3PcOJ7oFYEMWKQnpm0Y9ak@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190808014423.20377-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
On Wed, 07 Aug 2019, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> wrote:
> I've been trying to identify MMIO ranges to clearly define what belongs
> to display_uncore to do a check on access, but there are lots of
> exceptions and differences across gens (with a few more coming with TGL),
> so I don't think that's a viable way. The alternative option implemented
> here is to differentiate the register by type, which should ensure we
> never mix them up, but at the cost of a more complex transition.
>
> Thoughts? I'm very open to (and I actually hope for) better ideas.
Has there been any progress in this front lately, or have I just missed
it?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-29 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-08 1:44 [RFC 0/3] Display uncore Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-08-08 1:44 ` [RFC 1/3] drm/i915: split out uncore_mmio_debug Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-08-08 13:08 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-08-08 16:43 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-08-08 16:59 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-08 1:44 ` [RFC 2/3] drm/i915: introduce display_uncore Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-08-08 1:44 ` [RFC 3/3] drm/i915: convert a couple of registers to _DE_MMIO Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-08-08 2:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Display uncore (rev3) Patchwork
2019-08-08 2:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-08-08 2:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-08-08 13:29 ` [RFC 0/3] Display uncore Chris Wilson
2019-08-08 13:58 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-08 16:47 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-08-08 17:13 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-08-09 7:58 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-08 14:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Display uncore (rev3) Patchwork
2019-10-29 9:23 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-10-29 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/3] Display uncore Jani Nikula
2019-10-29 21:18 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-10-29 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-10-30 6:11 ` Jani Nikula
2019-10-30 6:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ftjbaor7.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).