public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Introduce execlist_port_* accessors
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 16:15:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8ucephj.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1z8epjk.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com>

Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> writes:

> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
>> Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-11-02 10:38:30)
>>> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>>> 
>>> > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-10-31 15:27:33)
>>> >> +static inline struct execlist_port *
>>> >> +execlists_port_next(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists,
>>> >> +                   const struct execlist_port * const port)
>>> >> +{
>>> >> +       const unsigned int n = __port_add(port_index(port, execlists),
>>> >> +                                         1,
>>> >> +                                         execlists->port_mask);
>>> >
>>> > How does this compare to
>>> >
>>> >       if (port++ == execlists->port + execlists->port_mask)
>>> >               port = execlists->port;
>>> >
>>> >       return port;
>>> > ?
>>> 
>>> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/1 up/down: 29/-29 (0)
>>> function                                     old     new   delta
>>> i915_guc_irq_handler                        2584    2613     +29
>>> intel_lrc_irq_handler                       2963    2934     -29
>>> Total: Before=1123627, After=1123627, chg +0.00%
>>
>> Hmm, your functions saw little difference and are twice as big as
>> mine... Weird.
>>
>> I used gcc version 6.3.0 20170516 (Debian 6.3.0-18) with defconfig.
>> Yourself?
>
> I had debugs on, sigh...
>
> Now with the defconfig and gcc (Ubuntu 6.3.0-12ubuntu2) 6.3.0 20170406:
>
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-139 (-139)
> function                                     old     new   delta
> i915_guc_irq_handler                        1620    1617      -3
> intel_lrc_irq_handler                       1926    1790    -136
>
> So we have a clear winner.
>

And to be precise on what diff lead to above:

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index 387667fe50d3..9131d66fb628 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -599,12 +599,12 @@ execlists_port_tail(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists)
 
 static inline struct execlist_port *
 execlists_port_next(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists,
-                   const struct execlist_port * const port)
+                   struct execlist_port *port)
 {
-       const unsigned int n = __port_add(port_index(port, execlists),
-                                         1,
-                                         execlists->port_mask);
-       return &execlists->port[n];
+       if (port++ == execlists->port + execlists->port_mask)
+               port = execlists->port;
+
+       return port;
 }



> -Mika
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-02 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31 15:27 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Introduce execlist_port_* accessors Mika Kuoppala
2017-10-31 15:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Move execlists port head instead of memmoving array Mika Kuoppala
2017-10-31 15:42   ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-02 15:07   ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-22 13:52     ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-11-22 13:57       ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-31 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Introduce execlist_port_* accessors Chris Wilson
2017-10-31 15:56   ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-02 10:38   ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-11-02 10:57     ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-02 14:14       ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-11-02 14:15         ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2017-10-31 15:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2017-11-02 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Mika Kuoppala
2017-11-02 15:03   ` Chris Wilson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-11-30  9:10 [PATCH 0/2] execlist port handling improvements Mika Kuoppala
2017-11-30  9:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Introduce execlist_port_* accessors Mika Kuoppala
2017-11-30 10:21   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-19 14:39 Mika Kuoppala
2017-10-19 14:48 ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-20 12:00   ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-10-19 14:50 ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-20 10:34 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-10-20 11:12   ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-10-20 11:26     ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-20 12:53     ` Mika Kuoppala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h8ucephj.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox