From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: add common intel_digital_port_connected function
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:00:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9nlxllb.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55DDD8CB.8080906@intel.com>
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> wrote:
> On 8/20/2015 1:17 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Add a common intel_digital_port_connected() that splits out to functions
>> for different platforms. No functional changes.
>>
>> v2: make the function return a boolean
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index f08859471841..f947951a01d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -4473,13 +4473,6 @@ edp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> return status;
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * ibx_digital_port_connected - is the specified port connected?
>> - * @dev_priv: i915 private structure
>> - * @port: the port to test
>> - *
>> - * Returns true if @port is connected, false otherwise.
>> - */
>> static bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> struct intel_digital_port *port)
>> {
>> @@ -4524,13 +4517,12 @@ static bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> return I915_READ(SDEISR) & bit;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool g4x_digital_port_connected(struct drm_device *dev,
>> +static bool g4x_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> struct intel_digital_port *port)
>> {
>> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> uint32_t bit;
>>
>> - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
>> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
> this might not work :(. just noted this as part of another review.
> please fix this since
> it is merged.
Sorry, what might not work?
Jani.
>> switch (port->port) {
>> case PORT_B:
>> bit = PORTB_HOTPLUG_LIVE_STATUS_VLV;
>> @@ -4565,6 +4557,22 @@ static bool g4x_digital_port_connected(struct drm_device *dev,
>> return I915_READ(PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT) & bit;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * intel_digital_port_connected - is the specified port connected?
>> + * @dev_priv: i915 private structure
>> + * @port: the port to test
>> + *
>> + * Return %true if @port is connected, %false otherwise.
>> + */
>> +static bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> + struct intel_digital_port *port)
>> +{
>> + if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
>> + return ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
>> + else
>> + return g4x_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
>> +}
>> +
>> static enum drm_connector_status
>> ironlake_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> {
>> @@ -4572,7 +4580,7 @@ ironlake_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>
>> - if (!ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>> + if (!intel_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>> return connector_status_disconnected;
>>
>> return intel_dp_detect_dpcd(intel_dp);
>> @@ -4594,7 +4602,7 @@ g4x_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> return status;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!g4x_digital_port_connected(dev, intel_dig_port))
>> + if (!intel_digital_port_connected(dev->dev_private, intel_dig_port))
>> return connector_status_disconnected;
>>
>> return intel_dp_detect_dpcd(intel_dp);
>> @@ -5057,13 +5065,8 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
>> /* indicate that we need to restart link training */
>> intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
>>
>> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
>> - if (!ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>> - goto mst_fail;
>> - } else {
>> - if (!g4x_digital_port_connected(dev, intel_dig_port))
>> - goto mst_fail;
>> - }
>> + if (!intel_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>> + goto mst_fail;
>>
>> if (!intel_dp_get_dpcd(intel_dp)) {
>> goto mst_fail;
>
> --
> regards,
> Sivakumar
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 7:47 [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/i915: clean up *_digital_port_connected Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/i915: move ibx_digital_port_connected to intel_dp.c Jani Nikula
2015-08-26 5:04 ` Jindal, Sonika
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: make g4x_digital_port_connected return boolean status Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 8:17 ` R, Durgadoss
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: add MISSING_CASE annotation to ibx_digital_port_connected Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 14:26 ` R, Durgadoss
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: add common intel_digital_port_connected function Jani Nikula
2015-08-26 5:26 ` Jindal, Sonika
2015-08-26 15:18 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-08-27 7:00 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2015-08-27 8:01 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-08-27 8:08 ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-27 8:12 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915: split ibx_digital_port_connected to ibx and cpt variants Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915: split g4x_digital_port_connected to g4x and vlv variants Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915/bxt: Use correct live status register for BXT platform Jani Nikula
2015-08-26 5:32 ` Jindal, Sonika
2015-08-26 6:35 ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-26 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/i915: clean up *_digital_port_connected Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h9nlxllb.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox