From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4406EC433EF for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D139F10E270; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 17:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE81A10E411; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1648142761; x=1679678761; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=Iz5O18IBu0jlqU+HRUvbi861CM8LlAHGKnrD/fmVPjY=; b=cvu5Wwxij9VlCEudY18yvDE5tlS1Ru2sN+qrvrrMZml3lFbW+uUHOpoo g0NYVLpuxyH27MZO016ZtndZGAIyqMsyExA5NXY6SONS01nVZDbh+3Q8b i55p6yGGKttLlOur0uzYZxyk9UiP/CCupdVIT68gI86UIV/Ra5Ks5zqFq cMAgLLrMPp3CdUXjwYeUXfrR63QeRI17urePOWVfvE75bHRENy9elB7N9 +42khtN7pqb4Cxq56LJEQeS2y/jY4hB4STApTVvIDF8xt3Drpx1mOguY3 Hwowab/EGA3QlmH67LphGUo0T24kgBUTtGiQ0akDusx8VeLIMJyZ/gxy4 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10296"; a="258396684" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,208,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="258396684" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2022 10:25:59 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,208,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="786243413" Received: from adixit-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO adixit-arch.intel.com) ([10.252.135.167]) by fmsmga006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2022 10:25:58 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:25:58 -0700 Message-ID: <87ils3dzyx.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" To: Matthew Auld In-Reply-To: <20220324142621.347452-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> References: <20220324142621.347452-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> <20220324142621.347452-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] test/gem_lmem_swapping: account for object rounding X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:26:18 -0700, Matthew Auld wrote: > > On DG2 the object size might be rounded when allocating lmem. Make sure > we account for any rounding up. Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit