From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Kuoppala Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: No need to put forcewake after a reset Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:11:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87iorspqv4.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> References: <1392996723-8886-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com> <1392996723-8886-6-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com> <20140305145807.GC17001@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8ACFA7C6 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:13:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140305145807.GC17001@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, miku@iki.fi List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Daniel Vetter writes: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:32:03PM +0200, mika.kuoppala@intel.com wrote: >> From: Mika Kuoppala >> >> As we now have intel_uncore_forcewake_reset() no need >> to do explicit put after reset. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala > > I've merged patches 2-4 from this series now too (patch 1 is already > merged). But this one conflicts badly with Ville's patch, can you please > respin? Didn't find 4/5 from dinq so rebased 4 and 5 on top of dinq at: 1394035700-19630-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com -Mika > Thanks, Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch