From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel: Fix bufmgr_gem->gen for gen > 4 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:14:53 -0800 Message-ID: <87ipjtxas2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> References: <1327945310-24565-1-git-send-email-chad.versace@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0538122059==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1327945310-24565-1-git-send-email-chad.versace@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chad Versace , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0538122059== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:41:50 -0800, Chad Versace wrote: > If the pci_device's actual gen was > 4, then we stupidly set > bufmgr_gem->gen = 6. Might be worth a note to say that no behavior should change. Still, Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8m7C0ACgkQHUdvYGzw6vdvWACgkqLhBxA7pyngM1wNzSEVL8Rs 7pkAn1og3lTmltHV76upXIW1b6o9+2Dg =uFP2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============0538122059== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx --===============0538122059==--