public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: daniel.vetter@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/5] Link Training Compliance support, link rate fallback sending Uevent
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:17:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k2dgs5qc.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475883169-7960-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

On Sat, 08 Oct 2016, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> This adds support in the kernel to handle link training compliance
> requests and send a uevent to train at requested parameters.
> In this patch series, if the link training fails in modeset, then a
> hotplug uevent is added to a work queue and scheduled and failed link
> parameters are stored in intel_dp structure. This uevent
> gets executed after the modeset is completed and after locks are released.
> In the modeset retry, modes are validated based on lower link rate from
> the failed link rate value to prune the modes in intel_dp_mode_valid().
> The lower link rate is then used toc onfigure the pipe and link is retrained
> at this lower link rate.
>
> I have tested this with DPR-120 and the compliance tests are passing.
> The DP CTS spec is based on DP 1.2 spec and it only expects to reduce the link
> rate and train at the max lane count without reducing the lane count. Lane count
> reduction is added in DP 1.3 so Unigraf has agreed to add it to their next SW release.
> Hence I have not implemented fallback for lane count. But I can add it if you think
> we should add DP 1.3 link training algorithm.
>
> Please let me know your feedback on this. Compliance app is not required for link training
> tests and so I have tested this fallback using kernel console mode on Source DUT.

The question is, can you pass the link training tests using a userspace
that responds to hotplug uevents? I think you mentioned a timeout in the
CTS. If you're using fbdev, I think the retry modeset may happen faster
than with a regular userspace.

BR,
Jani.


>
> v2:
> * Corect the order of patches for correct dependencies
>
> Manasi Navare (4):
>   drm/i915; Add a function to return index of link rate
>   drm/i915: Add support for DP link training compliance
>   drm/i915: Work queue for uevent
>   drm/i915: Link Rate fallback on Link training failure
>
> Navare, Manasi D (1):
>   drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |   2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c              |  10 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c               | 277 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c |  12 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h              |   8 +-
>  5 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-10 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-07 23:32 [PATCH RFC v2 0/5] Link Training Compliance support, link rate fallback sending Uevent Manasi Navare
2016-10-07 23:32 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/5] drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c Manasi Navare
2016-10-07 23:32 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/5] drm/i915; Add a function to return index of link rate Manasi Navare
2016-10-07 23:32 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] drm/i915: Add support for DP link training compliance Manasi Navare
2016-10-07 23:32 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/5] drm/i915: Work queue for uevent Manasi Navare
2016-10-07 23:32 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/5] drm/i915: Link Rate fallback on Link training failure Manasi Navare
2016-10-10 13:17 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2016-10-10 14:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Link Training Compliance support, link rate fallback sending Uevent (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k2dgs5qc.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox